61d9d219f9
* Withdraw authority no longer implies a custodian Before this change, if the withdraw authority and custodian had the same public key, then a withdraw authority signature would imply a custodian signature and lockup would be not be enforced. After this change, the client's withdraw instruction must explictly reference a custodian account in its optional sixth account argument. Likewise, the fee-payer no longer implies either a withdraw authority or custodian. * Fix test The test was configuring the stake account with the fee-payer as the withdraw authority, but then passing in a different key to the withdraw instruction's withdraw authority parameter. It only worked because the second transaction was signed by the fee-payer. |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| offline | ||
| checks.rs | ||
| cli.rs | ||
| cli_output.rs | ||
| cluster_query.rs | ||
| display.rs | ||
| lib.rs | ||
| main.rs | ||
| nonce.rs | ||
| spend_utils.rs | ||
| stake.rs | ||
| test_utils.rs | ||
| validator_info.rs | ||
| vote.rs | ||