From 863a7c7786e4e08011cd6d22770af040f5aea343 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "mergify[bot]" <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2022 15:04:53 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] feat: `ScheduleUpgradeNoHeightValidation` for automated upgrades w/o gov proposal (backport #11551) (#11574) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit * feat: `ScheduleUpgradeNoHeightValidation` for automated upgrades w/o gov proposal (#11551) ## Description Implements a `ScheduleUpgradeNoHeightValidation` function for chains to schedule an automated upgrade (using the `x/upgrade` module) without having to go through a governance proposal. This is beneficial to coordinate upgrades without having to manually download the new version, do the migration and restart the chain. This is the procedure Evmos used for its automated upgrade. --- ### Author Checklist *All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and please add links to any relevant follow up issues.* I have... - [ ] included the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title - [ ] added `!` to the type prefix if API or client breaking change - [ ] targeted the correct branch (see [PR Targeting](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#pr-targeting)) - [ ] provided a link to the relevant issue or specification - [ ] followed the guidelines for [building modules](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/docs/building-modules) - [ ] included the necessary unit and integration [tests](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#testing) - [ ] added a changelog entry to `CHANGELOG.md` - [ ] included comments for [documenting Go code](https://blog.golang.org/godoc) - [ ] updated the relevant documentation or specification - [ ] reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary - [ ] confirmed all CI checks have passed ### Reviewers Checklist *All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.* I have... - [ ] confirmed the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title - [ ] confirmed `!` in the type prefix if API or client breaking change - [ ] confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed - [ ] reviewed state machine logic - [ ] reviewed API design and naming - [ ] reviewed documentation is accurate - [ ] reviewed tests and test coverage - [ ] manually tested (if applicable) (cherry picked from commit 5b02bf459f2da26202a7b661cbfaf54e1f7595f9) # Conflicts: # CHANGELOG.md # x/upgrade/abci_test.go # x/upgrade/keeper/keeper.go * fix conflicts * changelog * fix test Co-authored-by: Federico Kunze Küllmer <31522760+fedekunze@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Federico Kunze Küllmer --- CHANGELOG.md | 4 ++++ x/upgrade/abci_test.go | 42 ++++++++++++++++++-------------------- x/upgrade/keeper/keeper.go | 6 ++++-- 3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) diff --git a/CHANGELOG.md b/CHANGELOG.md index 080fd112a..c1a25c685 100644 --- a/CHANGELOG.md +++ b/CHANGELOG.md @@ -37,6 +37,10 @@ Ref: https://keepachangelog.com/en/1.0.0/ ## [Unreleased] +### Features + +* (x/upgrade) [\#11551](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/pull/11551) Update `ScheduleUpgrade` for chains to schedule an automated upgrade on `BeginBlock` without having to go though governance. + ## [v0.45.2](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/releases/tag/v0.45.2) - 2022-04-05 ### Features diff --git a/x/upgrade/abci_test.go b/x/upgrade/abci_test.go index 731de6af8..b38b6e21d 100644 --- a/x/upgrade/abci_test.go +++ b/x/upgrade/abci_test.go @@ -64,14 +64,14 @@ func TestRequireName(t *testing.T) { s := setupTest(10, map[int64]bool{}) err := s.handler(s.ctx, &types.SoftwareUpgradeProposal{Title: "prop", Plan: types.Plan{}}) - require.NotNil(t, err) + require.Error(t, err) require.True(t, errors.Is(sdkerrors.ErrInvalidRequest, err), err) } func TestRequireFutureBlock(t *testing.T) { s := setupTest(10, map[int64]bool{}) - err := s.handler(s.ctx, &types.SoftwareUpgradeProposal{Title: "prop", Plan: types.Plan{Name: "test", Height: s.ctx.BlockHeight()}}) - require.NotNil(t, err) + err := s.handler(s.ctx, &types.SoftwareUpgradeProposal{Title: "prop", Plan: types.Plan{Name: "test", Height: s.ctx.BlockHeight() - 1}}) + require.Error(t, err) require.True(t, errors.Is(sdkerrors.ErrInvalidRequest, err), err) } @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ func TestDoHeightUpgrade(t *testing.T) { s := setupTest(10, map[int64]bool{}) t.Log("Verify can schedule an upgrade") err := s.handler(s.ctx, &types.SoftwareUpgradeProposal{Title: "prop", Plan: types.Plan{Name: "test", Height: s.ctx.BlockHeight() + 1}}) - require.Nil(t, err) + require.NoError(t, err) VerifyDoUpgrade(t) } @@ -88,9 +88,9 @@ func TestCanOverwriteScheduleUpgrade(t *testing.T) { s := setupTest(10, map[int64]bool{}) t.Log("Can overwrite plan") err := s.handler(s.ctx, &types.SoftwareUpgradeProposal{Title: "prop", Plan: types.Plan{Name: "bad_test", Height: s.ctx.BlockHeight() + 10}}) - require.Nil(t, err) + require.NoError(t, err) err = s.handler(s.ctx, &types.SoftwareUpgradeProposal{Title: "prop", Plan: types.Plan{Name: "test", Height: s.ctx.BlockHeight() + 1}}) - require.Nil(t, err) + require.NoError(t, err) VerifyDoUpgrade(t) } @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ func TestHaltIfTooNew(t *testing.T) { s := setupTest(10, map[int64]bool{}) t.Log("Verify that we don't panic with registered plan not in database at all") var called int - s.keeper.SetUpgradeHandler("future", func(ctx sdk.Context, plan types.Plan, vm module.VersionMap) (module.VersionMap, error) { + s.keeper.SetUpgradeHandler("future", func(_ sdk.Context, _ types.Plan, vm module.VersionMap) (module.VersionMap, error) { called++ return vm, nil }) @@ -180,10 +180,10 @@ func TestCanClear(t *testing.T) { s := setupTest(10, map[int64]bool{}) t.Log("Verify upgrade is scheduled") err := s.handler(s.ctx, &types.SoftwareUpgradeProposal{Title: "prop", Plan: types.Plan{Name: "test", Height: s.ctx.BlockHeight() + 100}}) - require.Nil(t, err) + require.NoError(t, err) err = s.handler(s.ctx, &types.CancelSoftwareUpgradeProposal{Title: "cancel"}) - require.Nil(t, err) + require.NoError(t, err) VerifyCleared(t, s.ctx) } @@ -192,11 +192,11 @@ func TestCantApplySameUpgradeTwice(t *testing.T) { s := setupTest(10, map[int64]bool{}) height := s.ctx.BlockHeader().Height + 1 err := s.handler(s.ctx, &types.SoftwareUpgradeProposal{Title: "prop", Plan: types.Plan{Name: "test", Height: height}}) - require.Nil(t, err) + require.NoError(t, err) VerifyDoUpgrade(t) t.Log("Verify an executed upgrade \"test\" can't be rescheduled") err = s.handler(s.ctx, &types.SoftwareUpgradeProposal{Title: "prop", Plan: types.Plan{Name: "test", Height: height}}) - require.NotNil(t, err) + require.Error(t, err) require.True(t, errors.Is(sdkerrors.ErrInvalidRequest, err), err) } @@ -242,9 +242,7 @@ func VerifySet(t *testing.T, skipUpgradeHeights map[int64]bool) { } func TestContains(t *testing.T) { - var ( - skipOne int64 = 11 - ) + var skipOne int64 = 11 s := setupTest(10, map[int64]bool{skipOne: true}) VerifySet(t, map[int64]bool{skipOne: true}) @@ -303,7 +301,7 @@ func TestUpgradeSkippingOne(t *testing.T) { req := abci.RequestBeginBlock{Header: newCtx.BlockHeader()} err := s.handler(s.ctx, &types.SoftwareUpgradeProposal{Title: "prop", Plan: types.Plan{Name: "test", Height: skipOne}}) - require.Nil(t, err) + require.NoError(t, err) t.Log("Verify if skip upgrade flag clears upgrade plan in one case and does upgrade on another") VerifySet(t, map[int64]bool{skipOne: true}) @@ -316,7 +314,7 @@ func TestUpgradeSkippingOne(t *testing.T) { t.Log("Verify the second proposal is not skipped") err = s.handler(s.ctx, &types.SoftwareUpgradeProposal{Title: "prop2", Plan: types.Plan{Name: "test2", Height: skipTwo}}) - require.Nil(t, err) + require.NoError(t, err) // Setting block height of proposal test2 newCtx = newCtx.WithBlockHeight(skipTwo) VerifyDoUpgradeWithCtx(t, newCtx, "test2") @@ -338,7 +336,7 @@ func TestUpgradeSkippingOnlyTwo(t *testing.T) { req := abci.RequestBeginBlock{Header: newCtx.BlockHeader()} err := s.handler(s.ctx, &types.SoftwareUpgradeProposal{Title: "prop", Plan: types.Plan{Name: "test", Height: skipOne}}) - require.Nil(t, err) + require.NoError(t, err) t.Log("Verify if skip upgrade flag clears upgrade plan in both cases and does third upgrade") VerifySet(t, map[int64]bool{skipOne: true, skipTwo: true}) @@ -351,7 +349,7 @@ func TestUpgradeSkippingOnlyTwo(t *testing.T) { // A new proposal with height in skipUpgradeHeights err = s.handler(s.ctx, &types.SoftwareUpgradeProposal{Title: "prop2", Plan: types.Plan{Name: "test2", Height: skipTwo}}) - require.Nil(t, err) + require.NoError(t, err) // Setting block height of proposal test2 newCtx = newCtx.WithBlockHeight(skipTwo) require.NotPanics(t, func() { @@ -360,7 +358,7 @@ func TestUpgradeSkippingOnlyTwo(t *testing.T) { t.Log("Verify a new proposal is not skipped") err = s.handler(s.ctx, &types.SoftwareUpgradeProposal{Title: "prop3", Plan: types.Plan{Name: "test3", Height: skipThree}}) - require.Nil(t, err) + require.NoError(t, err) newCtx = newCtx.WithBlockHeight(skipThree) VerifyDoUpgradeWithCtx(t, newCtx, "test3") @@ -375,7 +373,7 @@ func TestUpgradeWithoutSkip(t *testing.T) { newCtx := s.ctx.WithBlockHeight(s.ctx.BlockHeight() + 1).WithBlockTime(time.Now()) req := abci.RequestBeginBlock{Header: newCtx.BlockHeader()} err := s.handler(s.ctx, &types.SoftwareUpgradeProposal{Title: "prop", Plan: types.Plan{Name: "test", Height: s.ctx.BlockHeight() + 1}}) - require.Nil(t, err) + require.NoError(t, err) t.Log("Verify if upgrade happens without skip upgrade") require.Panics(t, func() { s.module.BeginBlock(newCtx, req) @@ -438,7 +436,7 @@ func TestBinaryVersion(t *testing.T) { }) err := s.handler(s.ctx, &types.SoftwareUpgradeProposal{Title: "Upgrade test", Plan: types.Plan{Name: "test0", Height: s.ctx.BlockHeight() + 2}}) - require.Nil(t, err) + require.NoError(t, err) newCtx := s.ctx.WithBlockHeight(12) s.keeper.ApplyUpgrade(newCtx, types.Plan{ @@ -455,7 +453,7 @@ func TestBinaryVersion(t *testing.T) { "test panic: upgrade needed", func() (sdk.Context, abci.RequestBeginBlock) { err := s.handler(s.ctx, &types.SoftwareUpgradeProposal{Title: "Upgrade test", Plan: types.Plan{Name: "test2", Height: 13}}) - require.Nil(t, err) + require.NoError(t, err) newCtx := s.ctx.WithBlockHeight(13) req := abci.RequestBeginBlock{Header: newCtx.BlockHeader()} diff --git a/x/upgrade/keeper/keeper.go b/x/upgrade/keeper/keeper.go index 7dee3efd5..4d2c83499 100644 --- a/x/upgrade/keeper/keeper.go +++ b/x/upgrade/keeper/keeper.go @@ -171,7 +171,9 @@ func (k Keeper) ScheduleUpgrade(ctx sdk.Context, plan types.Plan) error { return err } - if plan.Height <= ctx.BlockHeight() { + // NOTE: allow for the possibility of chains to schedule upgrades in begin block of the same block + // as a strategy for emergency hard fork recoveries + if plan.Height < ctx.BlockHeight() { return sdkerrors.Wrap(sdkerrors.ErrInvalidRequest, "upgrade cannot be scheduled in the past") } @@ -375,7 +377,7 @@ func (k Keeper) DumpUpgradeInfoWithInfoToDisk(height int64, name string, info st return err } - return ioutil.WriteFile(upgradeInfoFilePath, bz, 0600) + return os.WriteFile(upgradeInfoFilePath, bz, 0o600) } // GetUpgradeInfoPath returns the upgrade info file path