Update overview.md
This commit is contained in:
parent
b1a1f192fb
commit
bba7a3053d
|
@ -64,9 +64,11 @@ for further details.
|
|||
Charging commission on Atom provisions while also allowing for Atom-provisions
|
||||
to be auto-bonded (distributed directly to the validators bonded stake) is
|
||||
problematic within BPoS. Fundamentally, these two mechanisms are mutually
|
||||
exclusive. If there are both commissions and auto-bonding on the staking token,
|
||||
the amount of staking tokens each validator and delegator has would change each
|
||||
block, so we would have to iterate through all of them.
|
||||
exclusive. If both commission and auto-bonding mechanisms are simultaneously
|
||||
applied to the staking-token then the distribution of staking-tokens between
|
||||
any validator and its delegators will change with each block. This then
|
||||
necessitates a calculation for each delegation records for each block -
|
||||
which is considered computationally expensive.
|
||||
|
||||
In conclusion, we can only have Atom commission and unbonded atoms
|
||||
provisions or bonded atom provisions with no Atom commission, and we elect to
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue