Update assumptions
This commit is contained in:
parent
da0d907d12
commit
fd64da8587
|
@ -76,6 +76,12 @@ cases. This may require introducing prefixes to transactions.
|
|||
concrete types are registered. Can we rely on this mechanism or do we need a
|
||||
custom true injective encoding?
|
||||
|
||||
User-agents such Voyager, Metamask, and Ledger may provide human-readable and
|
||||
structured data, but this data must be consistent in terms of the field types
|
||||
and structure itself encoded via `amino`. This would require said applications
|
||||
to have an `amino` implementation. This may yet further warrant a simple custom
|
||||
encoding.
|
||||
|
||||
> TODO: Do we need to implement a custom encoding scheme instead of or atop
|
||||
amino similar or equal to EIP-712 `hashStruct`? As far as I know, this is mostly
|
||||
due to providing Soldity efficiencies and addressing limitations.
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue