In the process of making the internals of `scan_block_with_runner`
reusable across Sapling and Orchard, it became evident that key
identifier abstraction along the lines of #1175 is needed more
generally. This commit refactors the use of ZIP 32 account identifiers
and key scopes to better separate scanning concerns from ZIP 32 key
derivation. In the process, this removes a fair amount of unnecessary
polymorphism from `zcash_client_backend::wallet::WalletTx` and related
types.
This PR was extracted from https://github.com/zcash/librustzcash/pull/1175
in order to make the changes to `zcash_client_backend` usable without
the additional generalizations to `zcash_client_sqlite` made by that PR.
Co-authored-by: Andrew Arnott <andrewarnott@live.com>
It needn't return the account id that was given as an input, and it shouldn't return an 11-byte diversifier index when a 31-bit child index is more appropriate.
This default only made sense in the context of what was supported by
`zcash_client_sqlite`, and not in any other context. Unified address
requests no longer have their parts conditioned by what feature flags
are available; instead, if a request is constructed for which the
required key parts are not supported under a particular selection of
feature flags, address generation will raise a runtime error.
This unification allows us to better isolate transparent-input dependent
functionality. Previously, `TransparentInputSource` could not be placed
under a feature flag because the interface was needed for proposal
deserialization; by instead making the transparent input source methods
flag-dependent, we can correctly produce an error when proposal
deserializaiton attempts to select transparent inputs and the feature
flag is off.
We plan to also introduce a similar flag to gate access to Sapling
functionality. Since introduction of Orchard functionality is still
nascent, it's the correct time to introduce this isolation, before
there's more functionality that needs to be isolated in this fashion.
`ReceivedNote` now allows Orchard notes to be represented as received
notes. As part of this change, received notes now track whether they
were received using internally- or externally-scoped viewing keys.
This eliminates the need to trial-regenerate notes using the wallet's
IVKs to determine scope at spend time.
Prior to this change, it's necessary to implement the entirety of the
`WalletRead` trait in order to be able to use the input selection
functionality provided by `zcash_client_backend::data_api::input_selection`.
This change factors out the minimal operations required for transaction
proposal construction to better reflect the principle of least authority
and make the input selection code reusable in more contexts.
In order to minimize the operations of the newly-created `InputSource`
and `ShieldingSource` traits, this change also removes the
`min_confirmations` field from transaction proposals, in favor of
storing explicit target and anchor heights. This has the effect of
limiting the lifetime of transaction proposals to `PRUNING_DEPTH -
min_confirmations` blocks.
In order to use `uint64` for amounts that must be nonnegative in the
`proposal.proto` file, it is useful to update fee and change computation
to use `NonNegativeAmount` where possible.
We don't need to iterate over them, but the `*_extrema` internal methods
are semantically returning inclusive ranges, and using `RangeInclusive`
avoids bugs where the wrong half of the tuple is used (instead moving
the location of the tuple handling inside the `*_extrema` methods, which
cuts the number of occurrences from linear in the number of function
calls to constant).
This fixes the following bug:
Due to complexities related to non-linear scanning, checkpoints are only
added to the wallet's commitment tree in cases where there are notes
discovered within a scanned block. At present, the `shardtree` API only
makes it possible to add multiple checkpoints of the same tree state
when adding checkpoints at the chain tip, and this functionality is not
used by `zcash_client_backend` because we perform checkpoint insertion
in batches that may contain gaps in the case that multiple blocks
contain no Sapling notes. While it would be possible to fix this by
altering the `shardtree` API to permit explicit insertion of multiple
checkpoints of the same tree state at a given note position, this fix
takes a simpler approach.
Instead of ensuring that a checkpoint exists at every block and
computing the required checkpoint depth directly from the minimum number
of confirmations required when attempting a spend, we alter the
`WalletCommitmentTrees` API to allow internal information of the note
commitment tree to be used to determine this checkpoint depth, given the
minimum number of commitments as an argument. This allows us to select a
usable checkpoint from the sparse checkpoint set that resulted from the
sparse insertion of checkpoints described above.
The intent of this API is to provide a single API which returns in a
single call:
* per-account balances, including pending values
* wallet sync progress
Fixes#865Fixes#900
This also removes the zcash_client_sqlite-specific database
initialization procedures in favor of a standardized approach using the
methods available via the data access API.
Kris Nuttycombe
Kris Nuttycombe
Andrew Arnott
Jack Grigg