diff --git a/book/src/design/actions.md b/book/src/design/actions.md index 645aa88d..3da38a95 100644 --- a/book/src/design/actions.md +++ b/book/src/design/actions.md @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ # Actions In Sprout, we had a single proof that represented two spent notes and two new notes. This -was necessary in order to faciliate spending multiple notes in a single transaction (to +was necessary in order to facilitate spending multiple notes in a single transaction (to balance value, an output of one JoinSplit could be spent in the next one), but also provided a minimal level of arity-hiding: single-JoinSplit transactions all looked like 2-in 2-out transactions, and in multi-JoinSplit transactions each JoinSplit looked like a diff --git a/src/circuit.rs b/src/circuit.rs index 74aed99d..db5e9e10 100644 --- a/src/circuit.rs +++ b/src/circuit.rs @@ -209,7 +209,7 @@ impl plonk::Circuit for Circuit { // Poseidon requires four advice columns, while ECC incomplete addition requires // six, so we could choose to configure them in parallel. However, we only use a - // single Poseidon invocation, and we have the rows to accomodate it serially. + // single Poseidon invocation, and we have the rows to accommodate it serially. // Instead, we reduce the proof size by sharing fixed columns between the ECC and // Poseidon chips. let lagrange_coeffs = [ @@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ impl plonk::Circuit for Circuit { let poseidon_config = PoseidonChip::configure::( meta, // We place the state columns after the partial_sbox column so that the - // pad-and-add region can be layed out more efficiently. + // pad-and-add region can be laid out more efficiently. advices[6..9].try_into().unwrap(), advices[5], rc_a,