Decrement sapling note witnesses

This commit is contained in:
Eirik Ogilvie-Wigley 2018-07-17 11:53:24 -06:00 committed by Simon
parent be43b7469d
commit 9d804cc619
1 changed files with 42 additions and 35 deletions

View File

@ -868,45 +868,52 @@ void CWallet::IncrementNoteWitnesses(const CBlockIndex* pindex,
// of the wallet.dat is maintained).
}
template<typename NoteDataMap>
void DecrementNoteWitnesses(NoteDataMap& noteDataMap, int indexHeight, int64_t nWitnessCacheSize)
{
for (auto& item : noteDataMap) {
auto* nd = &(item.second);
// Only decrement witnesses that are not above the current height
if (nd->witnessHeight <= indexHeight) {
// Check the validity of the cache
// See comment below (this would be invalid if there were a
// prior decrement).
assert(nWitnessCacheSize >= nd->witnesses.size());
// Witnesses being decremented should always be either -1
// (never incremented or decremented) or equal to the height
// of the block being removed (indexHeight)
assert((nd->witnessHeight == -1) || (nd->witnessHeight == indexHeight));
if (nd->witnesses.size() > 0) {
nd->witnesses.pop_front();
}
// indexHeight is the height of the block being removed, so
// the new witness cache height is one below it.
nd->witnessHeight = indexHeight - 1;
}
// Check the validity of the cache
// Technically if there are notes witnessed above the current
// height, their cache will now be invalid (relative to the new
// value of nWitnessCacheSize). However, this would only occur
// during a reindex, and by the time the reindex reaches the tip
// of the chain again, the existing witness caches will be valid
// again.
// We don't set nWitnessCacheSize to zero at the start of the
// reindex because the on-disk blocks had already resulted in a
// chain that didn't trigger the assertion below.
if (nd->witnessHeight < indexHeight) {
// Subtract 1 to compare to what nWitnessCacheSize will be after
// decrementing.
assert((nWitnessCacheSize - 1) >= nd->witnesses.size());
}
}
}
void CWallet::DecrementNoteWitnesses(const CBlockIndex* pindex)
{
LOCK(cs_wallet);
for (std::pair<const uint256, CWalletTx>& wtxItem : mapWallet) {
for (mapSproutNoteData_t::value_type& item : wtxItem.second.mapSproutNoteData) {
SproutNoteData* nd = &(item.second);
// Only increment witnesses that are not above the current height
if (nd->witnessHeight <= pindex->nHeight) {
// Check the validity of the cache
// See comment below (this would be invalid if there was a
// prior decrement).
assert(nWitnessCacheSize >= nd->witnesses.size());
// Witnesses being decremented should always be either -1
// (never incremented or decremented) or equal to pindex
assert((nd->witnessHeight == -1) ||
(nd->witnessHeight == pindex->nHeight));
if (nd->witnesses.size() > 0) {
nd->witnesses.pop_front();
}
// pindex is the block being removed, so the new witness cache
// height is one below it.
nd->witnessHeight = pindex->nHeight - 1;
}
// Check the validity of the cache
// Technically if there are notes witnessed above the current
// height, their cache will now be invalid (relative to the new
// value of nWitnessCacheSize). However, this would only occur
// during a reindex, and by the time the reindex reaches the tip
// of the chain again, the existing witness caches will be valid
// again.
// We don't set nWitnessCacheSize to zero at the start of the
// reindex because the on-disk blocks had already resulted in a
// chain that didn't trigger the assertion below.
if (nd->witnessHeight < pindex->nHeight) {
// Subtract 1 to compare to what nWitnessCacheSize will be after
// decrementing.
assert((nWitnessCacheSize - 1) >= nd->witnesses.size());
}
}
::DecrementNoteWitnesses(wtxItem.second.mapSproutNoteData, pindex->nHeight, nWitnessCacheSize);
::DecrementNoteWitnesses(wtxItem.second.mapSaplingNoteData, pindex->nHeight, nWitnessCacheSize);
}
nWitnessCacheSize -= 1;
// TODO: If nWitnessCache is zero, we need to regenerate the caches (#1302)