Fix an error reporting bug due to BrokenPipeError and ConnectionResetError not existing in Python 2
refs #2263
Signed-off-by: Daira Hopwood <daira@jacaranda.org>
Usability improvements for z_importkey
- Add height parameter to z_importkey to reduce rescan range
- Change semantics of rescan parameter, so users can explicitly force a rescan
for existing keys.
Closes#2032
Python's httplib does not graciously handle disconnections from the http server, resulting in BadStatusLine errors.
See https://bugs.python.org/issue3566 "httplib persistent connections violate MUST in RFC2616 sec 8.1.4."
This was fixed in Python 3.5.
Work around it for now.
- Add height parameter to z_importkey to reduce rescan range
- Change semantics of rescan parameter, so users can explicitly force a rescan
for existing keys.
Closes#2032
Bitcoin 0.12 test PRs 1
Cherry-picked from the following upstream PRs:
- bitcoin/bitcoin#6337
- bitcoin/bitcoin#6390
- bitcoin/bitcoin#5515
- bitcoin/bitcoin#6287 (partial, remainder included in bitcoin/bitcoin#6703)
- bitcoin/bitcoin#6465
Part of #2074.
JSON makes no distinction between numbers and reals, and our code
doesn't need to do so either.
This removes VREAL, as well as its specific post-processing in
`UniValue::write`. Non-monetary amounts do not need to be forcibly
formatted with 8 decimals, so the extra roundtrip was unnecessary
(and potentially loses precision).
Zcash: cherry-picked from commit 7650449a6777710cf818d41862626164da0cd412
Left over from 2aee461930
Since unspendable outputs can't be spent, there is no threshold at which it would be uneconomic to spend them.
This primarily targets transaction outputs with `OP_RETURN`.
---
Initially based on:
commit 9cf0ae26350033d43d5dd3c95054c0d1b1641eda
Author: zathras-crypto <zathrasc@gmail.com>
Date: Wed Mar 25 02:04:02 2015 -0700
Changes:
- cherry-picked on top of bitcoin:master
- added RPC test for fundrawtransaction
Test prioritisetransaction
After talking with @str4d about #1884 , I wrote a test for prioritisetransaction. It uses small blocks (11kb), and checks whether a transaction makes it into the next block after being prioritized by that node.
Should this be improved with a larger number of txs in the mempool, or by testing over multiple runs?
As for getblocktemplate(), it seems to return the prioritized transaction within the block size set by the node (about 50 txs fit in an 11kb block), but the block "sizelimit" it displays is set at 2 MB in `rpcmining.cpp` line 690:
```
result.push_back(Pair("sizelimit", (int64_t)MAX_BLOCK_SIZE));
```
This was quite confusing, I didn't think the `-blockmaxsize` parameter I was setting was working for awhile.