The CoinbaseData field can only be constructed by the transaction parser, so we
can ensure that a coinbase input is always serializable, as CoinbaseData
instances can't be constructed outside of the parser that maintains the data
size invariant.
BIP34, which is included in Zcash, encodes the block height into each
block by adding it into the unused BitcoinScript field of the block's
coinbase transaction. However, this is done just by requiring that the
script pushes the block height onto the stack when it executes, and
there are multiple different ways to push data onto the stack in
BitcoinScript. Also, the genesis block does not include the block
height, by accident.
Because we want to *parse* transactions into an algebraic data type that
encodes their structural properties, rather than allow possibly-invalid
data to float through the internals of our node, we want to extract the
block height upfront and store it separately from the rest of the
coinbase data, which is inert. So the serialization code now contains
just enough logic to parse BitcoinScript-encoded block heights, and
special-case the encoding of the genesis block.
Elsewhere in the source code, the `LockTime` struct requires that we
must use block heights less than 500,000,000 (above which the number is
interpreted as a unix timestamp, not a height). To unify invariants, we
ensure that the parsing logic works with block heights up to
500,000,000, even though these are unlikely to ever be used for Zcash.
Coinbase inputs are handled differently from other inputs and have
different consensus rules, so they should be represented differently in
the source code. This lets us discard extraneous details (for instance,
it's not necessary to maintain the all-zero hash) and specialize logic.
* Added a few more top-level fields for the Transaction struct
* Add a placeholder Script type.
This could alternately use bytes::Bytes to save some allocations
but I don't think this is important to get perfectly now. In the future, we
will want to have all of the script handling code in the zebra-script crate,
but we will need to have a container type for an encoded script in zebra-chain,
because otherwise zebra-chain would depend on zebra-script and not the other
way around.
* Rename Transaction{Input,Output} -> Transparent{Input,Output}.
These are only *transparent* inputs and outputs, so by putting Transparent in
the name (instead of Transaction) it's more clear that a transaction's inputs
or outputs can also be shielded.
* Add a LockTime enum.
* First attempt at a Transaction enum.
This attempts to map the versioning and field presence rules into an ADT, so
that structurally invalid transactions (e.g., a BCTV14 proof in a Sapling
transaction) are unrepresentable.
* Update zebra-chain/src/transaction.rs
Co-Authored-By: Daira Hopwood <daira@jacaranda.org>
* Add fixme note on type refinement.
* Rename Transaction variants according to version.
* Split transaction.rs into submodules.
* Start filling in spend, output descriptions.
* Progress on JoinSplit data structures.
This has a lot of duplication and should really use generics to abstract over
Sprout-on-BCTV14 or Sprout-on-Groth16.
* Add data types for Bctv14 and Groth16 proofs.
This also adds a trait to abstract over them.
* Make JoinSplit descriptions generic over the proof system.
* Update zebra-chain/src/transaction/joinsplit.rs
Jane Lusby
Henry de Valence
Jane Lusby
Deirdre Connolly