* add zebrad acceptance tests
* add custom command test helpers that work with kill
* add and use info event for start and seed commands
* combine conflicting tests into one test case
Co-authored-by: Jane Lusby <jane@zfnd.org>
We get the injected TokioComponent dependency before the config is
loaded, so we can't use it to open the endpoints.
And we can't define after_config, because we use derive(Component).
So we work around these issues by opening the endpoints manually,
from the application's after_config.
* make zebra-checkpoints
* fix LOOKAHEAD_LIMIT scope
* add a default cli path
* change doc usage text
* add tracing
* move MAX_CHECKPOINT_HEIGHT_GAP to zebra-consensus
* do byte_reverse_hex in a map
This seems like a better design on principle but also appears to give a much
nicer sawtooth pattern of queued blocks in the checkpointer and a much smoother
pattern of block requests.
We had a brief discussion on discord and it seemed like we had consensus on the
following versioning policy:
* zebrad: match major version to NU version, so we will start by releasing
zebrad 3.0.0;
* zebra-* libraries: start by matching zebrad's version, then increment major
versions of each library as we need to make breaking changes (potentially
faster than the zebrad version, always respecting semver but making no
guarantees about the longevity of major releases).
This commit sets all of the crate versions to 3.0.0-alpha.0 -- the -alpha.0
marks it as a prerelease not subject to perfect adherence to compatibility
guarantees.
Closes#697.
per https://github.com/ZcashFoundation/zebra/issues/697#issuecomment-662742971
The response to a getblocks message is an inv message with the hashes of the
following blocks. However, inv messages are also sent unsolicited to gossip new
blocks across the network. Normally, this wouldn't be a problem, because for
every other request we filter only for the messages that are relevant to us.
But because the response to a getblocks message is an inv, the network layer
doesn't (and can't) distinguish between the response inv and the unsolicited
inv.
But there is a mitigation we can do. In our sync algorithm we have two phases:
(1) "ObtainTips" to get a set of tips to chase down, (2) repeatedly call
"ExtendTips" to extend those as far as possible. The unsolicited inv messages
have length 1, but when extending tips we expect to get more than one hash. So
we could reject responses in ExtendTips that have length 1 in order to ignore
these messages. This way we automatically ignore gossip messages during initial
block sync (while we're extending a tip) but we don't ignore length-1 responses
while trying to obtain tips (while querying the network for new tips).
Closes#617.
Closes#698.
The remaining work on the syncer is alluded to in a new comment:
1. Correctly constructing a block locator object
2. Detecting when we've stopped making progress syncing and restarting obtain_tips.
* fix: Resist CheckpointVerifier memory DoS attacks
Allow a maximum of 2 queued blocks at each height, as a tradeoff between
efficient bad block rejection, and memory usage.
Closes#628.
* fix: Make max queued blocks at height equal to fanout
* fix: Just allocate all the capacity upfront
* fix: Use with_capacity(1) and reserve_exact(1)
* Log at warn level for commands that use stdout
* Let zebrad revhex read from stdin
Most unix tools support reading from stdin, so they can be used in
pipelines.
Part of #564.
* Flatten consensus::verify::* to consensus::*
* Move consensus::*::tests into their own files
* Move CheckpointList into its own file
* Move Progress and Target into a types module
QueuedBlock and QueuedBlockList can stay in checkpoint.rs, because
they are tightly coupled to CheckpointVerifier.
* also download tips and filter tips
* dispatch all block downloads together
* tweek to match henry's changes
* switch to more intuitive match
Co-authored-by: Jane Lusby <jane@zfnd.org>
dependabot[bot]
Alfredo Garcia
teor
Henry de Valence
Jane Lusby
Jane Lusby
Dimitris Apostolou