Commit Graph

7 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Alfredo Garcia d72211fbbe
feat(zebra-checkpoints): make `zebra-checkpoints` work for zebrad backend (#5894)
* make `zebra-checkpoint` util work with zebra as the backend

* update snapshots

* update documentation

* applies suggestions from code review

* irefactor zebra-checkpoints to work with zebra using deserialization of the raw block

* fix imports and derives

* rename mode to backend

* remove old stuff

* fix docs

Co-authored-by: arya2 <aryasolhi@gmail.com>
2023-01-23 04:50:45 +00:00
teor 05440763ac
change(verifier): Update Zebra's block hash checkpoints (#4183)
* Update zebra-checkpoints docs for new default checkpoint config

Also:
- update commands
- link to the spec definition of settled network upgrades

* Update mainnet checkpoints

* Update testnet checkpoints
2022-04-25 14:43:06 +00:00
Alfredo Garcia a9fe0d9d3e
Make sure the mandatory checkpoint includes Canopy activation (#2235)
* Make sure the Canopy activation block is a finalized checkpoint block

This enables ZIP-221 chain history from Canopy activation onwards.

* Clarify that the mandatory checkpoint test includes Canopy activation

The test was correct, but the docs and assertion message did not include activation.

* Document that the mandatory checkpoint includes Canopy activation

Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>
2021-06-03 10:24:08 +10:00
Alfredo Garcia a292cbe611 change the mandatory checkpoint to Canopy 2021-03-18 10:13:47 +10:00
Alfredo Garcia d725eeb4d6
Add documentation to zebra-utils and checkpoint generation (#1491)
* create readme for utils and checkpoints
* add link to checkpoint usage to book

Co-authored-by: Deirdre Connolly <durumcrustulum@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>
2020-12-14 11:34:22 +10:00
teor d2173cae7e
Basic documentation for zebra-checkpoints (#1361) 2020-11-24 10:49:41 +10:00
Henry de Valence bdf66387d6
Reorganize the book. (#843)
* Reorganize the book.

This PR has one unfortunate change, which is that the README.md and
CONTRIBUTING.md files in the book are symlinks to files in the parent
directory.  The motivation for this is to ensure that we don't maintain two
copies of the same data, and that the landing page of the website matches the
landing page of the Github repo, etc.   However, I'm not sure whether these
symlinks will work correctly on Windows.

The alternatives are:

- Duplicate the contents of the files and expect that people will know to keep
  them in sync;

- Use relative links `../../README.md` in the `SUMMARY.md`.  This seemed like
  it caused mdbook to dump the rendered files into the repository root rather
  than keeping them in the `book` directory.

- Use a symlink (chosen option).  This may not work on Windows but I think that
  the worst outcome would be that the book would be unbuildable unless someone
  used WSL or something.  This seems like the least bad option.

* Remove symlinks in favor of #include 

Turns out the symlinks aren't required!
2020-08-06 15:39:54 -07:00