This moves the tests::generate module into the block tests. Because
this whole set of changes is just focused on reorganization, the
generate code is unchanged, but in the future, the code should be
rewritten as a collection of proptest strategies.
This extracts the `difficulty` module from `block` and the
`equihash_solution` module from the crate root. The PoW calculations
are significantly more complicated than the other block code and pretty
dissimilar from it, so it makes more sense to create a common proof of
work module.
The `EquihashSolution` and `EQUIHASH_SOLUTION_SIZE` are renamed to
`equihash::Solution` and `equihash::SOLUTION_SIZE` and imported that
way, except in `block/header.rs`, to avoid a conflict with the
`equihash` crate. In the future it would be better to encapsulate the
equihash solution check into the `equihash::Solution` type so that
callers only need to import our `work::equihash`.
The test organization leaves a little to be desired but I think that
this can be improved as we fill out the proof of work implementation.
This extracts the SHA256d code from being split across two modules and puts it
in one module, under serialization.
The code is unchanged except for three deleted tests:
* `sha256d_flush` in `sha256d_writer` (not a meaningful test);
* `transactionhash_debug` (constructs an invalid transaction hash, and the
behavior is tested in the next test);
* `decode_state_debug` (we do not need to test the Debug output of
DecodeState);
* add block size limit test
* calculate max_transactions_in_block and max_inputs_in_tx
* abstract block generation
* move all test vectors to zebra-test
* Added a few more top-level fields for the Transaction struct
* Add a placeholder Script type.
This could alternately use bytes::Bytes to save some allocations
but I don't think this is important to get perfectly now. In the future, we
will want to have all of the script handling code in the zebra-script crate,
but we will need to have a container type for an encoded script in zebra-chain,
because otherwise zebra-chain would depend on zebra-script and not the other
way around.
* Rename Transaction{Input,Output} -> Transparent{Input,Output}.
These are only *transparent* inputs and outputs, so by putting Transparent in
the name (instead of Transaction) it's more clear that a transaction's inputs
or outputs can also be shielded.
* Add a LockTime enum.
* First attempt at a Transaction enum.
This attempts to map the versioning and field presence rules into an ADT, so
that structurally invalid transactions (e.g., a BCTV14 proof in a Sapling
transaction) are unrepresentable.
* Update zebra-chain/src/transaction.rs
Co-Authored-By: Daira Hopwood <daira@jacaranda.org>
* Add fixme note on type refinement.
* Rename Transaction variants according to version.
* Split transaction.rs into submodules.
* Start filling in spend, output descriptions.
* Progress on JoinSplit data structures.
This has a lot of duplication and should really use generics to abstract over
Sprout-on-BCTV14 or Sprout-on-Groth16.
* Add data types for Bctv14 and Groth16 proofs.
This also adds a trait to abstract over them.
* Make JoinSplit descriptions generic over the proof system.
* Update zebra-chain/src/transaction/joinsplit.rs
Failure uses a distinct Fail trait rather than the standard library's
Error trait, which causes a lot of interoperability problems with tower
and other Error-using crates. Since failure was created, the standard
library's Error trait was improved, and its conveniences are now
available without the custom Fail trait using `thiserror` (for easy
error derives) and `anyhow` (for a better boxed Error).
The core serialization logic is now in zebra-chain and consists of two
pairs of traits:
These are analogues of the Serde `Serialize` and `Deserialize` traits,
but explicitly intended for consensus-critical serialization formats.
Thus some struct `Foo` may have derived `Serialize` and `Deserialize`
implementations for (internal) use with Serde, and explicitly-written
`ZcashSerialize` and `ZcashDeserialize` implementations for use in
consensus-critical contexts. The consensus-critical implementations
provide `zcash`-prefixed `zcash_serialize` and `zcash_deserialize`
methods to make it clear in client contexts that the serialization is
consensus-critical.
These are utility traits, analogous to the `ReadBytesExt` and
`WriteBytesExt` traits provided by `byteorder`. A generic
implementation is provided for any `io::Read` or `io::Write`, so that
bringing the traits into scope adds additional Zcash-specific traits to
generic readers and writers -- for instance, writing a `u64` in the
Bitcoin "CompactSize" format.
Henry de Valence
Deirdre Connolly
teor
Alfredo Garcia
Jane Lusby