Per discussion where @yaahc suggested that it would be simpler to delete this function entirely and treat it as an implementation detail.
Co-authored-by: Jane Lusby <jlusby42@gmail.com>
Fixes a race condition between the height and hash tree updates, when
they are executed simultaneously with GetDepth. `get_tip` uses the height
tree, but `get` uses the hash tree.
* attempt to use zcashconsensus crate in zebra-script
* boop
* update verify fn to use zebra types
* a bit more cleanup
* cleanup
* more
* beep boop
* fix renamed member
* cleaning
* get a real branch id
* remove as of yet unneeded api
* Update zebra-chain/src/transaction.rs
* Update zebra-chain/src/transaction.rs
* more cleanup
* oops wrong dep section
* use a tuple to communicate arg association
* update to use published version of zcash_script
* fix new compiler error
* install llvm on windows
* fix bindgen bug????
* try to get docker file to win
* okay try everything
* fix windows build maybe
* always download choco
* fix paths for moved types
* try a different error message
* try convenience script
* try installing just llvm
* add back one more
* try installing some headers
* try a diff package
* try everything
* remove the minimum
* try newer docker builder image
* cleanup docker image
* cleanup extra ci step
The ShieldedData container for the spend and output descriptions of a
transaction does *not* move, because it's encoding transaction
structure. A good sign that this is the right factoring is that the
transaction module now only needs to pull in sapling::{Spend, Output}
and not all the internals.
This is the first in a sequence of changes that change the block:: items
to not include Block as a prefix in their name, in accordance with the
Rust API guidelines.
This Merkle tree is the SHA256d one used only for including transactions
in a block, so it should be kept there in order to not be confused with
other Merkle trees (like the note commitment trees).
It's not accurate to call it a LightClientRootHash, because it's not
always a root has for a light client -- sometimes it's a different kind
of root hash.
This moves the tests::generate module into the block tests. Because
this whole set of changes is just focused on reorganization, the
generate code is unchanged, but in the future, the code should be
rewritten as a collection of proptest strategies.
This extracts the `difficulty` module from `block` and the
`equihash_solution` module from the crate root. The PoW calculations
are significantly more complicated than the other block code and pretty
dissimilar from it, so it makes more sense to create a common proof of
work module.
The `EquihashSolution` and `EQUIHASH_SOLUTION_SIZE` are renamed to
`equihash::Solution` and `equihash::SOLUTION_SIZE` and imported that
way, except in `block/header.rs`, to avoid a conflict with the
`equihash` crate. In the future it would be better to encapsulate the
equihash solution check into the `equihash::Solution` type so that
callers only need to import our `work::equihash`.
The test organization leaves a little to be desired but I think that
this can be improved as we fill out the proof of work implementation.
This moves the transaction strategies to `arbitrary`, to live with the
other strategy impls (`Arbitrary` is just a default type-associated
strategy), splits the proptests into a new `prop` module, and splits the
test vector checks into a `vector`s module.
This ensures that we keep code in leaf modules and only have
organization (use statements) in non-leaf modules.