Align constant names for maximum compact block / blocktxn depth

This commit is contained in:
Pieter Wuille 2016-08-31 17:35:59 +02:00
parent b2e93a343e
commit 3ac6de0a04
3 changed files with 10 additions and 5 deletions

View File

@ -632,9 +632,9 @@ class CompactBlocksTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
def test_compactblocks_not_at_tip(self, node, test_node): def test_compactblocks_not_at_tip(self, node, test_node):
# Test that requesting old compactblocks doesn't work. # Test that requesting old compactblocks doesn't work.
MAX_CMPCTBLOCK_DEPTH = 6 MAX_CMPCTBLOCK_DEPTH = 5
new_blocks = [] new_blocks = []
for i in range(MAX_CMPCTBLOCK_DEPTH): for i in range(MAX_CMPCTBLOCK_DEPTH + 1):
test_node.clear_block_announcement() test_node.clear_block_announcement()
new_blocks.append(node.generate(1)[0]) new_blocks.append(node.generate(1)[0])
wait_until(test_node.received_block_announcement, timeout=30) wait_until(test_node.received_block_announcement, timeout=30)

View File

@ -4878,7 +4878,7 @@ void static ProcessGetData(CNode* pfrom, const Consensus::Params& consensusParam
// and we don't feel like constructing the object for them, so // and we don't feel like constructing the object for them, so
// instead we respond with the full, non-compact block. // instead we respond with the full, non-compact block.
bool fPeerWantsWitness = State(pfrom->GetId())->fWantsCmpctWitness; bool fPeerWantsWitness = State(pfrom->GetId())->fWantsCmpctWitness;
if (CanDirectFetch(Params().GetConsensus()) && mi->second->nHeight >= chainActive.Height() - 5) { if (CanDirectFetch(consensusParams) && mi->second->nHeight >= chainActive.Height() - MAX_CMPCTBLOCK_DEPTH) {
CBlockHeaderAndShortTxIDs cmpctblock(block, fPeerWantsWitness); CBlockHeaderAndShortTxIDs cmpctblock(block, fPeerWantsWitness);
pfrom->PushMessageWithFlag(fPeerWantsWitness ? 0 : SERIALIZE_TRANSACTION_NO_WITNESS, NetMsgType::CMPCTBLOCK, cmpctblock); pfrom->PushMessageWithFlag(fPeerWantsWitness ? 0 : SERIALIZE_TRANSACTION_NO_WITNESS, NetMsgType::CMPCTBLOCK, cmpctblock);
} else } else
@ -5405,8 +5405,8 @@ bool static ProcessMessage(CNode* pfrom, string strCommand, CDataStream& vRecv,
return true; return true;
} }
if (it->second->nHeight < chainActive.Height() - 10) { if (it->second->nHeight < chainActive.Height() - MAX_BLOCKTXN_DEPTH) {
LogPrint("net", "Peer %d sent us a getblocktxn for a block > 10 deep", pfrom->id); LogPrint("net", "Peer %d sent us a getblocktxn for a block > %i deep", pfrom->id, MAX_BLOCKTXN_DEPTH);
return true; return true;
} }

View File

@ -90,6 +90,11 @@ static const unsigned int BLOCK_STALLING_TIMEOUT = 2;
/** Number of headers sent in one getheaders result. We rely on the assumption that if a peer sends /** Number of headers sent in one getheaders result. We rely on the assumption that if a peer sends
* less than this number, we reached its tip. Changing this value is a protocol upgrade. */ * less than this number, we reached its tip. Changing this value is a protocol upgrade. */
static const unsigned int MAX_HEADERS_RESULTS = 2000; static const unsigned int MAX_HEADERS_RESULTS = 2000;
/** Maximum depth of blocks we're willing to serve as compact blocks to peers
* when requested. For older blocks, a regular BLOCK response will be sent. */
static const int MAX_CMPCTBLOCK_DEPTH = 5;
/** Maximum depth of blocks we're willing to respond to GETBLOCKTXN requests for. */
static const int MAX_BLOCKTXN_DEPTH = 10;
/** Size of the "block download window": how far ahead of our current height do we fetch? /** Size of the "block download window": how far ahead of our current height do we fetch?
* Larger windows tolerate larger download speed differences between peer, but increase the potential * Larger windows tolerate larger download speed differences between peer, but increase the potential
* degree of disordering of blocks on disk (which make reindexing and in the future perhaps pruning * degree of disordering of blocks on disk (which make reindexing and in the future perhaps pruning