BTCPrivate
/
BTCP-Rebase
mirror of https://github.com/BTCPrivate/BTCP-Rebase.git
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Merge #12007: [Doc] Clarify the meaning of fee delta not being a fee rate in prioritisetransaction RPC 

c198dc00e1 [Doc] Clarify the meaning of fee delta not being a fee rate in prioritisetransaction RPC (Jan Čapek)

Pull request description:

  Hi,

  I have faced some confusion among our developers considering this being a fee rate. Would you consider including this tiny doc update?

  Best regards,

  Jan Capek

Tree-SHA512: cd0560540418e53c5c19ceab2d5aca229f4ef6b788b9543695742522e1c63a7f2cce2574b47fead098a106da2f77e297f0c728474565f6259b50d62369bbe7da
This commit is contained in:
MarcoFalke 2018-04-09 08:04:08 -04:00
parent a04440feb9 c198dc00e1
commit cd8e45b4e7
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: D2EA4850E7528B25
1 changed files with 1 additions and 0 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

1
src/rpc/mining.cpp
View File

@ -235,6 +235,7 @@ UniValue prioritisetransaction(const JSONRPCRequest& request)
"2. dummy (numeric, optional) API-Compatibility for previous API. Must be zero or null.\n"
" DEPRECATED. For forward compatibility use named arguments and omit this parameter.\n"
"3. fee_delta (numeric, required) The fee value (in satoshis) to add (or subtract, if negative).\n"
" Note, that this value is not a fee rate. It is a value to modify absolute fee of the TX.\n"
" The fee is not actually paid, only the algorithm for selecting transactions into a block\n"
" considers the transaction as it would have paid a higher (or lower) fee.\n"
"\nResult:\n"