todo: are those hibernating ports not well?
This commit is contained in:
parent
998d1caae1
commit
93edf72814
|
@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#define PORT_SIZE 16
|
#define PORT_SIZE 16
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// 168 ticks in microsecond in case of 168MHz 407
|
// todo: stm32 ticks are based on 4MHz timer I wonder if these CORE_CLOCK-based clocks are broken here?!
|
||||||
#define US_TO_NT_MULTIPLIER (CORE_CLOCK / 1000000)
|
#define US_TO_NT_MULTIPLIER (CORE_CLOCK / 1000000)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// Scheduler queue GPT device
|
// Scheduler queue GPT device
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
|
||||||
// This is the radical departure from STM32
|
// This is the radical departure from STM32
|
||||||
#define PORT_SIZE 18
|
#define PORT_SIZE 18
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// 168 ticks in microsecond in case of 168MHz 407
|
// todo: stm32 ticks are based on 4MHz timer I wonder if these CORE_CLOCK-based clocks are broken here?!
|
||||||
#define US_TO_NT_MULTIPLIER (CORE_CLOCK / 1000000)
|
#define US_TO_NT_MULTIPLIER (CORE_CLOCK / 1000000)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// Scheduler queue GPT device
|
// Scheduler queue GPT device
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue