Fix ref-count for multiple stores to the same pubkey in a slot, fixes zero lamport purge detection (#12462)
Co-authored-by: Carl Lin <carl@solana.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
e50386f928
commit
00b36e6db2
|
@ -2064,7 +2064,7 @@ impl AccountsDB {
|
|||
}
|
||||
drop(storage);
|
||||
datapoint_debug!("clean_dead_slots", ("stores", stores.len(), i64));
|
||||
let pubkeys: Vec<Vec<Pubkey>> = {
|
||||
let slot_pubkeys: HashSet<(Slot, Pubkey)> = {
|
||||
self.thread_pool_clean.install(|| {
|
||||
stores
|
||||
.into_par_iter()
|
||||
|
@ -2072,17 +2072,18 @@ impl AccountsDB {
|
|||
let accounts = store.accounts.accounts(0);
|
||||
accounts
|
||||
.into_iter()
|
||||
.map(|account| account.meta.pubkey)
|
||||
.collect::<Vec<Pubkey>>()
|
||||
.map(|account| (store.slot, account.meta.pubkey))
|
||||
.collect::<HashSet<(Slot, Pubkey)>>()
|
||||
})
|
||||
.reduce(HashSet::new, |mut reduced, store_pubkeys| {
|
||||
reduced.extend(store_pubkeys);
|
||||
reduced
|
||||
})
|
||||
.collect()
|
||||
})
|
||||
};
|
||||
let index = self.accounts_index.read().unwrap();
|
||||
for pubkey_v in pubkeys {
|
||||
for pubkey in pubkey_v {
|
||||
index.unref_from_storage(&pubkey);
|
||||
}
|
||||
for (_slot, pubkey) in slot_pubkeys {
|
||||
index.unref_from_storage(&pubkey);
|
||||
}
|
||||
drop(index);
|
||||
measure.stop();
|
||||
|
@ -3073,8 +3074,10 @@ pub mod tests {
|
|||
let pubkey2 = Pubkey::new_rand();
|
||||
let normal_account = Account::new(1, 0, &Account::default().owner);
|
||||
let zero_account = Account::new(0, 0, &Account::default().owner);
|
||||
|
||||
//store an account
|
||||
accounts.store(0, &[(&pubkey1, &normal_account)]);
|
||||
accounts.store(0, &[(&pubkey1, &normal_account)]);
|
||||
accounts.store(1, &[(&pubkey1, &zero_account)]);
|
||||
accounts.store(0, &[(&pubkey2, &normal_account)]);
|
||||
accounts.store(2, &[(&pubkey2, &normal_account)]);
|
||||
|
@ -3093,8 +3096,20 @@ pub mod tests {
|
|||
|
||||
//both zero lamport and normal accounts are cleaned up
|
||||
assert_eq!(accounts.alive_account_count_in_store(0), 0);
|
||||
// The only store to slot 1 was a zero lamport account, should
|
||||
// be purged by zero-lamport cleaning logic because slot 1 is
|
||||
// rooted
|
||||
assert_eq!(accounts.alive_account_count_in_store(1), 0);
|
||||
assert_eq!(accounts.alive_account_count_in_store(2), 1);
|
||||
|
||||
// Pubkey 1, a zero lamport account, should no longer exist in accounts index
|
||||
// because it has been removed
|
||||
assert!(accounts
|
||||
.accounts_index
|
||||
.read()
|
||||
.unwrap()
|
||||
.get(&pubkey1, None)
|
||||
.is_none());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
|
@ -4222,23 +4237,27 @@ pub mod tests {
|
|||
accounts.store(current_slot, &[(&pubkey1, &account2)]);
|
||||
accounts.store(current_slot, &[(&pubkey1, &account2)]);
|
||||
assert_eq!(1, accounts.alive_account_count_in_store(current_slot));
|
||||
assert_eq!(3, accounts.ref_count_for_pubkey(&pubkey1));
|
||||
// Stores to same pubkey, same slot only count once towards the
|
||||
// ref count
|
||||
assert_eq!(2, accounts.ref_count_for_pubkey(&pubkey1));
|
||||
accounts.add_root(current_slot);
|
||||
|
||||
// C: Yet more update to trigger lazy clean of step A
|
||||
current_slot += 1;
|
||||
assert_eq!(3, accounts.ref_count_for_pubkey(&pubkey1));
|
||||
assert_eq!(2, accounts.ref_count_for_pubkey(&pubkey1));
|
||||
accounts.store(current_slot, &[(&pubkey1, &account3)]);
|
||||
assert_eq!(4, accounts.ref_count_for_pubkey(&pubkey1));
|
||||
assert_eq!(3, accounts.ref_count_for_pubkey(&pubkey1));
|
||||
accounts.add_root(current_slot);
|
||||
|
||||
// D: Make pubkey1 0-lamport; also triggers clean of step B
|
||||
current_slot += 1;
|
||||
assert_eq!(4, accounts.ref_count_for_pubkey(&pubkey1));
|
||||
assert_eq!(3, accounts.ref_count_for_pubkey(&pubkey1));
|
||||
accounts.store(current_slot, &[(&pubkey1, &zero_lamport_account)]);
|
||||
accounts.process_dead_slots(None);
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
3, /* == 4 - 2 + 1 */
|
||||
// Removed one reference from the dead slot (reference only counted once
|
||||
// even though there were two stores to the pubkey in that slot)
|
||||
3, /* == 3 - 1 + 1 */
|
||||
accounts.ref_count_for_pubkey(&pubkey1)
|
||||
);
|
||||
accounts.add_root(current_slot);
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -159,15 +159,32 @@ impl<'a, T: 'a + Clone> AccountsIndex<T> {
|
|||
reclaims: &mut SlotList<T>,
|
||||
) -> Option<T> {
|
||||
if let Some(lock) = self.account_maps.get(pubkey) {
|
||||
let mut list = &mut lock.1.write().unwrap();
|
||||
// filter out other dirty entries
|
||||
reclaims.extend(list.iter().filter(|(f, _)| *f == slot).cloned());
|
||||
list.retain(|(f, _)| *f != slot);
|
||||
let list = &mut lock.1.write().unwrap();
|
||||
// filter out other dirty entries from the same slot
|
||||
let mut same_slot_previous_updates: Vec<(usize, (Slot, &T))> = list
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.enumerate()
|
||||
.filter_map(|(i, (s, value))| {
|
||||
if *s == slot {
|
||||
Some((i, (*s, value)))
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
None
|
||||
}
|
||||
})
|
||||
.collect();
|
||||
assert!(same_slot_previous_updates.len() <= 1);
|
||||
|
||||
lock.0.fetch_add(1, Ordering::Relaxed);
|
||||
if let Some((list_index, (s, previous_update_value))) = same_slot_previous_updates.pop()
|
||||
{
|
||||
reclaims.push((s, previous_update_value.clone()));
|
||||
list.remove(list_index);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
// Only increment ref count if the account was not prevously updated in this slot
|
||||
lock.0.fetch_add(1, Ordering::Relaxed);
|
||||
}
|
||||
list.push((slot, account_info));
|
||||
// now, do lazy clean
|
||||
self.purge_older_root_entries(&mut list, reclaims);
|
||||
self.purge_older_root_entries(list, reclaims);
|
||||
|
||||
None
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue