blockworks-foundation
/
solana
mirror of https://github.com/blockworks-foundation/solana.git
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity

maintain sorted order on ancient target slots (#30247)

This commit is contained in:
Jeff Washington (jwash) 2023-02-10 14:08:13 -06:00 committed by GitHub
parent ded457cd73
commit 33cc4cc3d5
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
1 changed files with 8 additions and 7 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

15
runtime/src/ancient_append_vecs.rs
View File

@ -324,6 +324,7 @@ impl AccountsDb {
/// 2a. pubkeys with refcount = 1. This means this pubkey exists NOWHERE else in accounts db.
/// 2b. pubkeys with refcount > 1
/// Note that the return value can contain fewer items than 'stored_accounts_all' if we find storages which won't be affected.
/// 'stored_accounts_all' should be sorted by slot
#[allow(dead_code)]
fn calc_accounts_to_combine<'a>(
&self,
@ -331,7 +332,7 @@ impl AccountsDb {
) -> AccountsToCombine<'a> {
let mut accounts_keep_slots = HashMap::default();
let len = stored_accounts_all.len();
let mut target_slots = Vec::with_capacity(len);
let mut target_slots_sorted = Vec::with_capacity(len);
let mut accounts_to_combine = Vec::with_capacity(len);
for (info, unique_accounts) in stored_accounts_all {
@ -349,14 +350,14 @@ impl AccountsDb {
} else {
// No alive accounts in this slot have a ref_count > 1. So, ALL alive accounts in this slot can be written to any other slot
// we find convenient. There is NO other instance of any account to conflict with.
target_slots.push(info.slot);
target_slots_sorted.push(info.slot);
}
accounts_to_combine.push(shrink_collect);
}
AccountsToCombine {
accounts_to_combine,
accounts_keep_slots,
target_slots,
target_slots_sorted,
}
}
@ -426,7 +427,7 @@ struct AccountsToCombine<'a> {
/// these slots will NOT be in 'accounts_keep_slots'
/// Some of these slots will have ancient append vecs created at them to contain everything in 'accounts_to_combine'
/// The rest will become dead slots with no accounts in them.
target_slots: Vec<Slot>,
target_slots_sorted: Vec<Slot>,
}
#[allow(dead_code)]
@ -1031,7 +1032,7 @@ pub mod tests {
.collect::<Vec<_>>();
accounts_keep.sort_unstable();
assert_eq!(accounts_keep, slots_vec);
assert!(accounts_to_combine.target_slots.is_empty());
assert!(accounts_to_combine.target_slots_sorted.is_empty());
assert_eq!(accounts_to_combine.accounts_keep_slots.len(), num_slots);
assert!(accounts_to_combine
.accounts_to_combine
@ -1051,7 +1052,7 @@ pub mod tests {
.is_empty()));
} else {
// all accounts should be in one_ref and all slots are available as target slots
assert_eq!(accounts_to_combine.target_slots, slots_vec);
assert_eq!(accounts_to_combine.target_slots_sorted, slots_vec);
assert!(accounts_to_combine.accounts_keep_slots.is_empty());
assert!(accounts_to_combine
.accounts_to_combine
@ -1177,7 +1178,7 @@ pub mod tests {
.collect::<Vec<_>>();
accounts_keep.sort_unstable();
assert_eq!(accounts_keep, slots_vec);
assert!(accounts_to_combine.target_slots.is_empty());
assert!(accounts_to_combine.target_slots_sorted.is_empty());
assert_eq!(accounts_to_combine.accounts_keep_slots.len(), num_slots);
assert_eq!(
accounts_to_combine