blockworks-foundation
/
solana
mirror of https://github.com/blockworks-foundation/solana.git
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity

docs: Fix SOL staked formula (#21615) 

Fix the formula on the proposal page: https://docs.solana.com/implemented-proposals/ed_overview/ed_validation_client_economics/ed_vce_state_validation_protocol_based_rewards
This commit is contained in:
Melroy van den Berg 2021-12-07 16:36:36 +01:00 committed by GitHub
parent 388e34f8e9
commit b57097ef18
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
1 changed files with 3 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
docs/src/implemented-proposals/ed_overview/ed_validation_client_economics/ed_vce_state_validation_protocol_based_rewards.md
View File

@ -39,7 +39,9 @@ From these simulated _Inflation Schedules_, we can also project ranges for token
Finally we can estimate the _Staked Yield_ on staked SOL, if we introduce an additional parameter, previously discussed, _% of Staked SOL_: Finally we can estimate the _Staked Yield_ on staked SOL, if we introduce an additional parameter, previously discussed, _% of Staked SOL_:
%~\text{SOL Staked} = \frac{\text{Total SOL Staked}}{\text{Total Current Supply}} $$
\%~\text{SOL Staked} = \frac{\text{Total SOL Staked}}{\text{Total Current Supply}}
$$
In this case, because _% of Staked SOL_ is a parameter that must be estimated (unlike the _Inflation Schedule_ parameters), it is easier to use specific _Inflation Schedule_ parameters and explore a range of _% of Staked SOL_. For the below example, we’ve chosen the middle of the parameter ranges explored above: In this case, because _% of Staked SOL_ is a parameter that must be estimated (unlike the _Inflation Schedule_ parameters), it is easier to use specific _Inflation Schedule_ parameters and explore a range of _% of Staked SOL_. For the below example, we’ve chosen the middle of the parameter ranges explored above: