61d9d219f9
* Withdraw authority no longer implies a custodian Before this change, if the withdraw authority and custodian had the same public key, then a withdraw authority signature would imply a custodian signature and lockup would be not be enforced. After this change, the client's withdraw instruction must explictly reference a custodian account in its optional sixth account argument. Likewise, the fee-payer no longer implies either a withdraw authority or custodian. * Fix test The test was configuring the stake account with the fee-payer as the withdraw authority, but then passing in a different key to the withdraw instruction's withdraw authority parameter. It only worked because the second transaction was signed by the fee-payer. |
||
|---|---|---|
| .buildkite | ||
| .github | ||
| .travis | ||
| account-decoder | ||
| accounts-bench | ||
| banking-bench | ||
| bench-exchange | ||
| bench-streamer | ||
| bench-tps | ||
| ci | ||
| clap-utils | ||
| cli | ||
| cli-config | ||
| client | ||
| core | ||
| crate-features | ||
| docs | ||
| dos | ||
| download-utils | ||
| explorer | ||
| faucet | ||
| genesis | ||
| genesis-programs | ||
| gossip | ||
| install | ||
| keygen | ||
| ledger | ||
| ledger-tool | ||
| local-cluster | ||
| log-analyzer | ||
| logger | ||
| measure | ||
| merkle-tree | ||
| metrics | ||
| multinode-demo | ||
| net | ||
| net-shaper | ||
| net-utils | ||
| notifier | ||
| perf | ||
| poh-bench | ||
| programs | ||
| ramp-tps | ||
| rayon-threadlimit | ||
| remote-wallet | ||
| runtime | ||
| scripts | ||
| sdk | ||
| stake-accounts | ||
| stake-monitor | ||
| stake-o-matic | ||
| streamer | ||
| sys-tuner | ||
| system-test | ||
| tokens | ||
| transaction-status | ||
| upload-perf | ||
| validator | ||
| version | ||
| vote-signer | ||
| watchtower | ||
| web3.js | ||
| .clippy.toml | ||
| .codecov.yml | ||
| .gitignore | ||
| .mergify.yml | ||
| .travis.yml | ||
| CONTRIBUTING.md | ||
| Cargo.lock | ||
| Cargo.toml | ||
| LICENSE | ||
| README.md | ||
| RELEASE.md | ||
| fetch-perf-libs.sh | ||
| fetch-spl.sh | ||
| run.sh | ||
README.md
Building
1. Install rustc, cargo and rustfmt.
$ curl https://sh.rustup.rs -sSf | sh
$ source $HOME/.cargo/env
$ rustup component add rustfmt
If your rustc version is lower than 1.39.0, please update it:
$ rustup update
On Linux systems you may need to install libssl-dev, pkg-config, zlib1g-dev, etc. On Ubuntu:
$ sudo apt-get update
$ sudo apt-get install libssl-dev libudev-dev pkg-config zlib1g-dev llvm clang
2. Download the source code.
$ git clone https://github.com/solana-labs/solana.git
$ cd solana
3. Build.
$ cargo build
4. Run a minimal local cluster.
$ ./run.sh
Testing
Run the test suite:
$ cargo test
Starting a local testnet
Start your own testnet locally, instructions are in the online docs.
Accessing the remote testnet
testnet- public stable testnet accessible via devnet.solana.com. Runs 24/7
Benchmarking
First install the nightly build of rustc. cargo bench requires use of the
unstable features only available in the nightly build.
$ rustup install nightly
Run the benchmarks:
$ cargo +nightly bench
Release Process
The release process for this project is described here.
Code coverage
To generate code coverage statistics:
$ scripts/coverage.sh
$ open target/cov/lcov-local/index.html
Why coverage? While most see coverage as a code quality metric, we see it primarily as a developer productivity metric. When a developer makes a change to the codebase, presumably it's a solution to some problem. Our unit-test suite is how we encode the set of problems the codebase solves. Running the test suite should indicate that your change didn't infringe on anyone else's solutions. Adding a test protects your solution from future changes. Say you don't understand why a line of code exists, try deleting it and running the unit-tests. The nearest test failure should tell you what problem was solved by that code. If no test fails, go ahead and submit a Pull Request that asks, "what problem is solved by this code?" On the other hand, if a test does fail and you can think of a better way to solve the same problem, a Pull Request with your solution would most certainly be welcome! Likewise, if rewriting a test can better communicate what code it's protecting, please send us that patch!
Disclaimer
All claims, content, designs, algorithms, estimates, roadmaps, specifications, and performance measurements described in this project are done with the author's best effort. It is up to the reader to check and validate their accuracy and truthfulness. Furthermore nothing in this project constitutes a solicitation for investment.