solana/cli
Greg Fitzgerald 61d9d219f9
Withdraw authority no longer implies a custodian (#11302)
* Withdraw authority no longer implies a custodian

Before this change, if the withdraw authority and custodian had
the same public key, then a withdraw authority signature would
imply a custodian signature and lockup would be not be enforced.

After this change, the client's withdraw instruction must
explictly reference a custodian account in its optional sixth
account argument.

Likewise, the fee-payer no longer implies either a withdraw
authority or custodian.

* Fix test

The test was configuring the stake account with the fee-payer as
the withdraw authority, but then passing in a different key to
the withdraw instruction's withdraw authority parameter. It only
worked because the second transaction was signed by the fee-payer.
2020-07-31 13:37:53 -06:00
..
src Withdraw authority no longer implies a custodian (#11302) 2020-07-31 13:37:53 -06:00
tests CLI: Fix explicitly plumb vote_account through create-vote-account 2020-07-14 07:29:53 -06:00
.gitignore Rename solana-wallet program to just solana (#5604) 2019-08-22 13:51:16 -07:00
Cargo.toml Bump thiserror from 1.0.19 to 1.0.20 2020-07-15 13:39:32 -07:00