132 lines
7.4 KiB
Markdown
132 lines
7.4 KiB
Markdown
|
# Stable Releases
|
||
|
|
||
|
*Stable Release Series* continue to receive bug fixes until they reach **End Of Life**.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Only the following release series are currently supported and receive bug fixes:
|
||
|
|
||
|
The `0.37.x` release series will continue receiving bug fixes until the Cosmos Hub
|
||
|
migrates to a newer release of the Cosmos-SDK.
|
||
|
|
||
|
* **0.37** will continue receiving bug fixes until the Cosmos Hub migrates to a newer release series of the Cosmos-SDK.
|
||
|
* **0.39 «Launchpad»** will be supported until 6 months after **0.40.0** is published. A fairly strict **bugfix-only** rule applies to pull requests that are requested to be included into a stable point-release.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The **0.39 «Launchpad»** release series is maintained in compliance with the **Stable Release Policy** as described in this document.
|
||
|
|
||
|
## Stable Release Policy
|
||
|
|
||
|
This policy presently applies *only* to the following release series:
|
||
|
|
||
|
* **0.39 «Launchpad»**
|
||
|
|
||
|
### Point Releases
|
||
|
|
||
|
Once a Cosmos-SDK release has been completed and published, updates for it are released under certain circumstances
|
||
|
and must follow the [Point Release Procedure](CONTRIBUTING.md).
|
||
|
|
||
|
### Rationale
|
||
|
|
||
|
Unlike in-development `master` branch snapshots, **Cosmos-SDK** releases are subject to much wider adoption,
|
||
|
and by a significantly different demographic of users. During development, changes in the `master` branch
|
||
|
affect SDK users, application developers, early adopters, and other advanced users that elect to use
|
||
|
unstable experimental software at their own risk.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Conversely, users of a stable release expect a high degree of stability. They build their applications on it, and the
|
||
|
problems they experience with it could be potentially highly disruptive to their projects.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Stable release updates are recommended to the vast majority of developers, and so it is crucial to treat them
|
||
|
with great caution. Hence, when updates are proposed, they must be accompanied by a strong rationale and present
|
||
|
a low risk of regressions, i.e. even one-line changes could cause unexpected regressions due to side effects or
|
||
|
poorly tested code. We never assume that any change, no matter how little or non-intrusive, is completely exempt
|
||
|
of regression risks.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Therefore, the requirements for stable changes are different than those that are candidates to be merged in
|
||
|
the `master` branch. When preparing future major releases, our aim is to design the most elegant, user-friendly and
|
||
|
maintainable SDK possible which often entails fundamental changes to the SDK's architecture design, rearranging and/or
|
||
|
renaming packages as well as reducing code duplication so that we maintain common functions and data structures in one
|
||
|
place rather than leaving them scattered all over the code base. However, once a release is published, the
|
||
|
priority is to minimise the risk caused by changes that are not strictly required to fix qualifying bugs; this tends to
|
||
|
be correlated with minimising the size of such changes. As such, the same bug may need to be fixed in different
|
||
|
ways in stable releases and `master` branch.
|
||
|
|
||
|
### What qualifies as a Stable Release Update (SRU)
|
||
|
|
||
|
* **High-impact bugs**
|
||
|
* Bugs that may directly cause a security vulnerability.
|
||
|
* *Severe regressions* from a Cosmos-SDK's previous release. This includes all sort of issues
|
||
|
that may cause the core packages or the `x/` modules unusable.
|
||
|
* Bugs that may cause **loss of user's data**.
|
||
|
* Other safe cases:
|
||
|
* Bugs which don't fit in the aforementioned categories for which an obvious safe patch is known.
|
||
|
* Relatively small yet strictly non-breaking changes that introduce forward-compatible client
|
||
|
features to smoothen the migration to successive releases.
|
||
|
|
||
|
### What does not qualify as SRU
|
||
|
|
||
|
* State machine changes.
|
||
|
* New features that introduces API breakages (e.g. public functions removal/renaming).
|
||
|
* Cosmetic fixes, such as formatting or linter warning fixes.
|
||
|
|
||
|
## What pull requests will be included in stable point-releases
|
||
|
|
||
|
Pull requests that fix bugs that fall in the following categories do not require a **Stable Release Exception** to be granted to be included in a stable point-release:
|
||
|
|
||
|
* **Severe regressions**.
|
||
|
* Bugs that may cause **client applications** to be **largely unusable**.
|
||
|
* Bugs that may cause **state corruption or data loss**.
|
||
|
* Bugs that may directly or indirectly cause a **security vulnerability**.
|
||
|
|
||
|
## What pull requests will NOT be automatically included in stable point-releases
|
||
|
|
||
|
As rule of thumb, the following changes will **NOT** be automatically accepted into stable point-releases:
|
||
|
|
||
|
* **State machine changes**.
|
||
|
* **Client application's code-breaking changes**, i.e. changes that prevent client applications to *build without modifications* to the client application's source code.
|
||
|
|
||
|
In some circumstances, PRs that don't meet the aforementioned criteria might be raised and asked to be granted a *Stable Release Exception*.
|
||
|
|
||
|
## Stable Release Exception - Procedure
|
||
|
|
||
|
1. Check that the bug is either fixed or not reproducible in `master`. It is, in general, not appropriate to release bug fixes for stable releases without first testing them in `master`. Please apply the label [0.39 «Launchpad»](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/labels/0.39%20LTS%20%28Launchpad%29) to the issue.
|
||
|
2. Add a comment to the issue and ensure it contains the following information (see the bug template below):
|
||
|
* **[Impact]** An explanation of the bug on users and justification for backporting the fix to the stable release.
|
||
|
* A **[Test Case]** section containing detailed instructions on how to reproduce the bug.
|
||
|
* A **[Regression Potential]** section with a clear assessment on how regressions are most likely to manifest as a result of the pull request that aims to fix the bug in the target stable release.
|
||
|
3. **Stable Release Managers** will review and discuss the PR. Once *consensus* surrounding the rationale has been reached and the technical review has successfully concluded, the pull request will be merged in the respective point-release target branch (e.g. `release/launchpad/0.39.X` being `X` the Launchpad's upcoming point-release) and the PR included in the point-release's respective milestone (e.g. `0.39.5`).
|
||
|
|
||
|
### Stable Release Exception - Bug template
|
||
|
|
||
|
```
|
||
|
#### Impact
|
||
|
|
||
|
Brief xplanation of the effects of the bug on users and a justification for backporting the fix to the stable release.
|
||
|
|
||
|
#### Test Case
|
||
|
|
||
|
Detailed instructions on how to reproduce the bug on Launchpad's most recently published point-release.
|
||
|
|
||
|
#### Regression Potential
|
||
|
|
||
|
Explanation on how regressions might manifest - even if it's unlikely.
|
||
|
It is assumed that stable release fixes are well-tested and they come with a low risk of regressions.
|
||
|
It's crucial to make the effort of thinking about what could happen in case a regression emerges.
|
||
|
```
|
||
|
|
||
|
## Stable Release Managers
|
||
|
|
||
|
The **Stable Release Managers** evaluate and approve or reject updates and backports to Cosmos-SDK Stable Release series,
|
||
|
according to the [stable release policy](#stable-release-policy) and [release procedure](#stable-release-exception-procedure).
|
||
|
Decisions are made by consensus.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Their responsibilites include:
|
||
|
* Driving the Stable Release Exception process.
|
||
|
* Approving/rejecting proposed changes to a stable release series.
|
||
|
* Executing the release process of stable point-releases in compliance with the [Point Release Procedure](CONTRIBUTING.md).
|
||
|
|
||
|
The Stable Release Managers are appointed by the Interchain Foundation.
|
||
|
|
||
|
*Stable Release Managers* for the **0.39 «Launchpad»** release series follow:
|
||
|
|
||
|
* @alessio - Alessio Treglia
|
||
|
* @clevinson - Cory Levinson-
|
||
|
* @ethanfrey - Ethan Frey
|