cosmos-sdk/store/cachekv/bench_helper_test.go

45 lines
1001 B
Go
Raw Normal View History

perf: store/cachekv: Correct the naming and implementation for existing benchmarks (#10116) ## Description Cref discussion in #10026, updates the CacheKV Benchmark naming and implementation to correspond to whats actually going on, and remove many irrelevant/incorrect components from being in the benchmarks timing. Basically the old Benchmark's iterator creation was very flawed, and never hit the complex case, only repeatedly performing the best case performance of the iterator. Instead it really benchmarked iterator set and next operations. This PR splits out the benchmarks for those two accordingly. --- ### Author Checklist *All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and please add links to any relevant follow up issues.* I have... - [x] included the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title - [x] added `!` to the type prefix if API or client breaking change - [x] targeted the correct branch (see [PR Targeting](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#pr-targeting)) - [x] provided a link to the relevant issue or specification - [x] followed the guidelines for [building modules](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/docs/building-modules) - [x] included the necessary unit and integration [tests](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#testing) - [x] added a changelog entry to `CHANGELOG.md` - N/A imo - [x] included comments for [documenting Go code](https://blog.golang.org/godoc) - [x] updated the relevant documentation or specification - [x] reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary - [x] confirmed all CI checks have passed - lint failure unrelated ### Reviewers Checklist *All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.* I have... - [ ] confirmed the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title - [ ] confirmed `!` in the type prefix if API or client breaking change - [ ] confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed - [ ] reviewed state machine logic - [ ] reviewed API design and naming - [ ] reviewed documentation is accurate - [ ] reviewed tests and test coverage - [ ] manually tested (if applicable)
2021-11-10 08:20:37 -08:00
package cachekv_test
import "crypto/rand"
func randSlice(sliceSize int) []byte {
bz := make([]byte, sliceSize)
_, _ = rand.Read(bz)
return bz
}
func incrementByteSlice(bz []byte) {
for index := len(bz) - 1; index >= 0; index-- {
if bz[index] < 255 {
bz[index]++
break
} else {
bz[index] = 0
}
}
}
// Generate many keys starting at startKey, and are in sequential order
func generateSequentialKeys(startKey []byte, numKeys int) [][]byte {
toReturn := make([][]byte, 0, numKeys)
cur := make([]byte, len(startKey))
copy(cur, startKey)
for i := 0; i < numKeys; i++ {
newKey := make([]byte, len(startKey))
copy(newKey, cur)
toReturn = append(toReturn, newKey)
incrementByteSlice(cur)
}
return toReturn
}
// Generate many random, unsorted keys
func generateRandomKeys(keySize int, numKeys int) [][]byte {
toReturn := make([][]byte, 0, numKeys)
for i := 0; i < numKeys; i++ {
newKey := randSlice(keySize)
toReturn = append(toReturn, newKey)
}
return toReturn
}