Merge PR #4312: Touch up light client docs
This commit is contained in:
parent
b63b81ab21
commit
8fecc7724b
|
@ -1,28 +1,28 @@
|
|||
# Lite Client Overview
|
||||
# Light Client Overview
|
||||
|
||||
**See the Cosmos SDK lite Client RPC documentation [here](https://cosmos.network/rpc/)**
|
||||
**See the Cosmos SDK Light Client RPC documentation [here](https://cosmos.network/rpc/)**
|
||||
|
||||
## Introduction
|
||||
|
||||
A lite client allows clients, such as mobile phones, to receive proofs of the state of the
|
||||
blockchain from any full node. lite clients do not have to trust any full node, since they are able
|
||||
to verify any proof they receive and hence full nodes cannot lie about the state of the network.
|
||||
A light client allows clients, such as mobile phones, to receive proofs of the state of the
|
||||
blockchain from any full node. Light clients do not have to trust any full node, since they are able
|
||||
to verify any proof they receive.
|
||||
|
||||
A lite client can provide the same security as a full node with the minimal requirements on
|
||||
bandwidth, computing and storage resource. As well, it can also provide modular functionality
|
||||
according to users' configuration. These fantastic features allow developers to build fully secure,
|
||||
efficient and usable mobile apps, websites or any other applications without deploying or
|
||||
A light client can provide the same security as a full node with minimal requirements for
|
||||
bandwidth, computing and storage resource. It can also provide modular functionality
|
||||
according to users' configuration. These features allow developers to build secure, efficient,
|
||||
and usable mobile apps, websites, and other applications without deploying or
|
||||
maintaining any full blockchain nodes.
|
||||
|
||||
### What is a lite Client
|
||||
### What is a Light Client?
|
||||
|
||||
The Cosmos SDK Light Client (Gaia-lite) is split into two separate components. The first component is generic for any Tendermint
|
||||
based application. It handles the security and connectivity aspects of following the header chain
|
||||
and verify proofs from full nodes against locally trusted validator set. Furthermore it exposes
|
||||
exactly the same API as any Tendermint Core node. The second component is specific for the Cosmos
|
||||
Hub (`gaiad`). It works as a query endpoint and exposes the application specific functionality, which
|
||||
can be arbitrary. All queries against the application state have to go through the query endpoint.
|
||||
The advantage of the query endpoint is that it can verify the proofs that the application returns.
|
||||
The Cosmos SDK Light Client (Gaia-lite) is split into two separate components. The first component is generic for
|
||||
any Tendermint-based application. It handles the security and connectivity aspects of following the header
|
||||
chain and verify proofs from full nodes against a locally trusted validator set. Furthermore, it exposes the same
|
||||
API as any Tendermint Core node. The second component is specific for the Cosmos Hub (`gaiad`). It works as a query
|
||||
endpoint and exposes the application specific functionality, which can be arbitrary. All queries against the
|
||||
application state must go through the query endpoint. The advantage of the query endpoint is that it can verify
|
||||
the proofs that the application returns.
|
||||
|
||||
### High-Level Architecture
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -35,27 +35,26 @@ initially support [ICS0](https://cosmos.network/rpc/#/ICS0) (TendermintAPI), [IC
|
|||
|
||||

|
||||
|
||||
All applications are expected to only run against Gaia-lite. Gaia-lite is the only piece of software
|
||||
All applications are expected to run only against Gaia-lite. Gaia-lite is the only piece of software
|
||||
that offers stability guarantees around the zone API.
|
||||
|
||||
### Comparison
|
||||
|
||||
A full node of ABCI is different from its lite client in the following ways:
|
||||
A full node of ABCI is different from a light client in the following ways:
|
||||
|
||||
|| Full Node | Gaia-lite | Description|
|
||||
|-| ------------- | ----- | -------------- |
|
||||
| Execute and verify transactions|Yes|No|A full node will execute and verify all transactions while Gaia-lite won't|
|
||||
| Verify and save blocks|Yes|No|A full node will verify and save all blocks while Gaia-lite won't|
|
||||
| Participate consensus| Yes|No|Only when the full node is a validator, it will participate consensus. Lite nodes never participate in consensus|
|
||||
| Bandwidth cost|Huge|Little|A full node will receive all blocks, if the bandwidth is limited, it will fall behind the main network. What's more, if it happens to be a validator, it will slow down the consensus process. Light clients requires little bandwidth. Only when serving local request, it will cost bandwidth|
|
||||
| Computing resource|Huge|Little|A full node will execute all transactions and verify all blocks|
|
||||
| Storage resource|Huge|Little|A full node will save all blocks and ABCI states. Gaia-lite just saves validator sets and some checkpoints|
|
||||
| Power consumption|Huge|Little|A full nodes have to be deployed on machines which have high performance and will be running all the time. So power consumption will be huge. Gaia-lite can be deployed on the same machine as user applications, or independently. There is not a requirement to run the lite-client at all times. Due to the lower power requirements of Gaia-lite, you are able to run it on mobile devices.|
|
||||
| Provide APIs|All cosmos APIs|Modular APIs|A full node supports all cosmos APIs. Gaia-lite provides modular APIs according to users' configuration|
|
||||
| Security level| High|High|A full node will verify all transactions and blocks by itself. A light client can't do this, but it can query any data from full nodes and verify the data independently. So both full nodes and light clients don't need to trust any third nodes, they can achieve high security|
|
||||
| Execute and verify transactions|Yes|No|A full node will execute and verify all transactions while Gaia-lite won't.|
|
||||
| Verify and save blocks|Yes|No|A full node will verify and save all blocks while Gaia-lite won't.|
|
||||
| Consensus participation|Yes|No|Only when a full node is a validator will it participate in consensus. Lite nodes never participate in consensus.|
|
||||
| Bandwidth cost|High|Low|A full node will receive all blocks. If bandwidth is limited, it will fall behind the main network. What's more, if it happens to be a validator, it will slow down the consensus process. Light clients require little bandwidth, only when serving local requests.|
|
||||
| Computing resources|High|Low|A full node will execute all transactions and verify all blocks, which requires considerable computing resources.|
|
||||
| Storage resources|High|Low|A full node will save all blocks and ABCI states. Gaia-lite just saves validator sets and some checkpoints.|
|
||||
| Power consumption|High|Low|Full nodes must be deployed on machines which have high performance and will be running all the time. Gaia-lite can be deployed on the same machines as users' applications, or on independent machines but with lower performance. Light clients can be shut down anytime when necessary. Gaia-lite consumes very little power, so even mobile devices can meet the power requirements.|
|
||||
| Provide APIs|All cosmos APIs|Modular APIs|A full node supports all Cosmos APIs. Gaia-lite provides modular APIs according to users' configuration.|
|
||||
| Secuity level| High|High|A full node will verify all transactions and blocks by itself. A light client can't do this, but it can query data from other full nodes and verify the data independently. Therefore, both full nodes and light clients don't need to trust any third nodes and can achieve high security.|
|
||||
|
||||
According to the above table, Gaia-lite can meet all users' functionality and security requirements, but
|
||||
only requires little resource on bandwidth, computing, storage and power.
|
||||
According to the above table, Gaia-lite can meet many users' functionality and security requirements, but require little bandwidth, computing, storage, and power.
|
||||
|
||||
## Achieving Security
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -66,8 +65,8 @@ The base design philosophy of Gaia-lite follows two rules:
|
|||
1. **Doesn't trust any blockchain nodes, including validator nodes and other full nodes**
|
||||
2. **Only trusts the whole validator set**
|
||||
|
||||
The original trusted validator set should be prepositioned into its trust store, usually this
|
||||
validator set comes from the genesis file. During runtime, if Gaia-lite detects a different validator set,
|
||||
The original trusted validator set should be prepositioned into its trust store. Usually this
|
||||
validator set comes from a genesis file. During runtime, if Gaia-lite detects a different validator set,
|
||||
it will verify it and save the new validated validator set to the trust store.
|
||||
|
||||

|
||||
|
@ -76,7 +75,8 @@ it will verify it and save the new validated validator set to the trust store.
|
|||
|
||||
From the above section, we come to know how to get a trusted validator set and how lcd keeps track of
|
||||
validator set evolution. The validator set is the foundation of trust, and the trust can propagate to
|
||||
other blockchain data, such as blocks and transactions. The propagate architecture is shown as
|
||||
other blockchain data, such as blocks and transactions. The propagation architecture is shown as
|
||||
|
||||
follows:
|
||||
|
||||

|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue