From 985b9017efec7d70cec99080100ba164637a7f59 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: billy rennekamp Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 17:55:59 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Update CONTRIBUTING.md removed secondary entirely --- CONTRIBUTING.md | 9 +++------ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/CONTRIBUTING.md b/CONTRIBUTING.md index 92ae65304..a1cd74bc2 100644 --- a/CONTRIBUTING.md +++ b/CONTRIBUTING.md @@ -369,14 +369,12 @@ should convene to rectify the situation by either: **Approval Committee & Decision Making** -In absense of general consensus, decision making requires ⅔ vote from the three members +In absense of general consensus, decision making requires 1/2 vote from the two members of the **Concept Approval Committee**. **Committee Members** -* Core Members: **Aaron** (Regen), **Bez** (IG), **Sunny** (Sikka), **Zaki** (Iqlusion) -* Secondary pool of candidates to replace / substitute: - * **Chris Goes** (Anoma), **Marko** (IG), **Ethan Buchman** (Informal), **Robert** (Regen), **Amaury** (Regen), **Fede** (Tharsis), **Emmanuel** (Orijtech) +* Core Members: **Aaron** (Regen), **Bez** (IG) **Committee Criteria** @@ -406,8 +404,7 @@ well as for PRs made as part of a release process: * Code reviewers should ensure the PR does exactly what the ADR said it should * Code reviewers should have more senior engineering capability -* ⅔ approval is required from the **primary repo maintainers** in `CODEOWNERS` - * Secondary pool of candidates to replace / substitute are listed as **secondary repo maintainers** in `CODEOWNERS` +* 1/2 approval is required from the **primary repo maintainers** in `CODEOWNERS` *Note: For any major or minor release series denoted as a "Stable Release" (e.g. v0.39 "Launchpad"), a separate release committee is often established. Stable Releases, and their corresponding release committees are documented