ADR-28 derive address functions (#9088)

* update Derive functions

* update adr-028

* changelog update

* Apply suggestions from code review

Co-authored-by: Marie Gauthier <marie.gauthier63@gmail.com>

* review updates

* remove DeriveMulti and rollback some changes in CHANGELOG

* add noop error check

Co-authored-by: Marie Gauthier <marie.gauthier63@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
Robert Zaremba 2021-04-15 23:32:45 +02:00 committed by GitHub
parent 261c7ebd89
commit e43edc4749
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
4 changed files with 45 additions and 21 deletions

View File

@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ Ref: https://keepachangelog.com/en/1.0.0/
* [\#8786](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/pull/8786) Enabled secp256r1 in x/auth.
* (rosetta) [\#8729](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/pull/8729) Data API fully supports balance tracking. Construction API can now construct any message supported by the application.
* [\#8754](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/pull/8875) Added support for reverse iteration to pagination.
* [#9088](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/pull/9088) Added implementation to ADR-28 Derived Addresses.
### Client Breaking Changes
* [\#8363](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/pull/8363) Addresses no longer have a fixed 20-byte length. From the SDK modules' point of view, any 1-255 bytes-long byte array is a valid address.
@ -82,6 +83,8 @@ Ref: https://keepachangelog.com/en/1.0.0/
* (x/bank) [\#8798](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/pull/8798) `GetTotalSupply` is removed in favour of `GetPaginatedTotalSupply`
* (x/bank/types) [\#9061](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/pull/9061) `AddressFromBalancesStore` now returns an error for invalid key instead of panic.
### State Machine Breaking
* (x/{bank,distrib,gov,slashing,staking}) [\#8363](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/issues/8363) Store keys have been modified to allow for variable-length addresses.

View File

@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ type Addressable interface {
Address() []byte
}
func NewComposed(typ string, subaccounts []Addressable) []byte {
func Composed(typ string, subaccounts []Addressable) []byte {
addresses = map(subaccounts, \a -> LengthPrefix(a.Address()))
addresses = sort(addresses)
return address.Hash(typ, addresses[0] + ... + addresses[n])
@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ func (multisig PubKey) Address() {
prefix := fmt.Sprintf("%s/%d", proto.MessageName(multisig), multisig.Threshold)
// use the Composed function defined above
return address.NewComposed(prefix, keys)
return address.Composed(prefix, keys)
}
```
@ -185,14 +185,14 @@ NOTE: this section is not finalize and it's in active discussion.
In Basic Address section we defined a module account address as:
```
```go
address.Hash("module", moduleName)
```
We use `"module"` as a schema type for all module derived addresses. Module accounts can have sub accounts. The derivation process has a defined order: module name, submodule key, subsubmodule key.
Module account addresses are heavily used in the SDK so it makes sense to optimize the derivation process: instead of using of using `LengthPrefix` for the module name, we use a null byte (`'\x00'`) as a separator. This works, because null byte is not a part of a valid module name.
```
```go
func Module(moduleName string, key []byte) []byte{
return Hash("module", []byte(moduleName) + 0 + key)
}
@ -208,24 +208,24 @@ If we want to create an address for a module account depending on more than one
btcAtomAMM := address.Module("amm", btc.Addrress() + atom.Address()})
```
We can continue the derivation process and can create an address for a submodule account.
#### Derived Addresses
```
func Submodule(address []byte, derivationKey []byte) {
return Hash("module", address + derivationKey)
We must be able to cryptographically derive one address from another one. The derivation process must guarantee hash properties, hence we use the already defined `Hash` function:
```go
func Derive(address []byte, derivationKey []byte) []byte {
return Hash(addres, derivationKey)
}
```
NOTE: if `address` is not a hash based address (with `LEN` length) then we should use `LengthPrefix`. An alternative would be to use one `Module` function, which takes a slice of keys and mapped with `LengthPrefix`. For final version we need to validate what's the most common use.
Note: `Module` is a special case of the more general _derived_ address, where we set the `"module"` string for the _from address_.
**Example** For a cosmwasm smart-contract address we could use the following construction:
```
smartContractAddr := Submodule(Module("cosmwasm", smartContractsNamespace), smartContractKey)
smartContractAddr := Derived(Module("cosmwasm", smartContractsNamespace), []{smartContractKey})
```
### Schema Types
A `typ` parameter used in `Hash` function SHOULD be unique for each account type.

View File

@ -20,20 +20,21 @@ type Addressable interface {
// Hash creates a new address from address type and key
func Hash(typ string, key []byte) []byte {
hasher := sha256.New()
hasher.Write(conv.UnsafeStrToBytes(typ))
_, err := hasher.Write(conv.UnsafeStrToBytes(typ))
// the error always nil, it's here only to satisfy the io.Writer interface
errors.AssertNil(err)
th := hasher.Sum(nil)
hasher.Reset()
_, err := hasher.Write(th)
// the error always nil, it's here only to satisfy the io.Writer interface
_, err = hasher.Write(th)
errors.AssertNil(err)
_, err = hasher.Write(key)
errors.AssertNil(err)
return hasher.Sum(nil)
}
// NewComposed creates a new address based on sub addresses.
func NewComposed(typ string, subAddresses []Addressable) ([]byte, error) {
// Compose creates a new address based on sub addresses.
func Compose(typ string, subAddresses []Addressable) ([]byte, error) {
as := make([][]byte, len(subAddresses))
totalLen := 0
var err error
@ -62,3 +63,8 @@ func Module(moduleName string, key []byte) []byte {
mKey := append([]byte(moduleName), 0)
return Hash("module", append(mKey, key...))
}
// Derive derives a new address from the main `address` and a derivation `key`.
func Derive(address []byte, key []byte) []byte {
return Hash(conv.UnsafeBytesToStr(address), key)
}

View File

@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ func (suite *AddressSuite) TestComposed() {
a2 := addrMock{[]byte{21, 22}}
typ := "multisig"
ac, err := NewComposed(typ, []Addressable{a1, a2})
ac, err := Compose(typ, []Addressable{a1, a2})
assert.NoError(err)
assert.Len(ac, Len)
@ -45,18 +45,18 @@ func (suite *AddressSuite) TestComposed() {
assert.Equal(ac, ac2, "NewComposed works correctly")
// changing order of addresses shouldn't impact a composed address
ac2, err = NewComposed(typ, []Addressable{a2, a1})
ac2, err = Compose(typ, []Addressable{a2, a1})
assert.NoError(err)
assert.Len(ac2, Len)
assert.Equal(ac, ac2, "NewComposed is not sensitive for order")
// changing a type should change composed address
ac2, err = NewComposed(typ+"other", []Addressable{a2, a1})
ac2, err = Compose(typ+"other", []Addressable{a2, a1})
assert.NoError(err)
assert.NotEqual(ac, ac2, "NewComposed must be sensitive to type")
// changing order of addresses shouldn't impact a composed address
ac2, err = NewComposed(typ, []Addressable{a1, addrMock{make([]byte, 300, 300)}})
ac2, err = Compose(typ, []Addressable{a1, addrMock{make([]byte, 300, 300)}})
assert.Error(err)
assert.Contains(err.Error(), "should be max 255 bytes, got 300")
}
@ -75,6 +75,21 @@ func (suite *AddressSuite) TestModule() {
assert.NotEqual(addr2, addr3, "changing key must change address")
}
func (suite *AddressSuite) TestDerive() {
assert := suite.Assert()
var addr, key1, key2 = []byte{1, 2}, []byte{3, 4}, []byte{1, 2}
d1 := Derive(addr, key1)
d2 := Derive(addr, key2)
d3 := Derive(key1, key2)
assert.Len(d1, Len)
assert.Len(d2, Len)
assert.Len(d3, Len)
assert.NotEqual(d1, d2)
assert.NotEqual(d1, d3)
assert.NotEqual(d2, d3)
}
type addrMock struct {
Addr []byte
}