<!--
The default pull request template is for types feat, fix, or refactor.
For other templates, add one of the following parameters to the url:
- template=docs.md
- template=other.md
-->
## Description
ref: #8961
<!-- Add a description of the changes that this PR introduces and the files that
are the most critical to review. -->
Following up on [#9697](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/pull/9697#pullrequestreview-727295733), this PR is the first step for the #8961.
---
### Author Checklist
*All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.*
I have...
- [x] included the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title
- [x] added `!` to the type prefix if API or client breaking change
- [x] targeted the correct branch (see [PR Targeting](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#pr-targeting))
- [x] provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
- [ ] followed the guidelines for [building modules](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/docs/building-modules)
- [ ] included the necessary unit and integration [tests](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#testing)
- [x] added a changelog entry to `CHANGELOG.md`
- [ ] included comments for [documenting Go code](https://blog.golang.org/godoc)
- [ ] updated the relevant documentation or specification
- [ ] reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
- [ ] confirmed all CI checks have passed
### Reviewers Checklist
*All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.*
I have...
- [ ] confirmed the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title
- [ ] confirmed `!` in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
- [ ] confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
- [ ] reviewed state machine logic
- [ ] reviewed API design and naming
- [ ] reviewed documentation is accurate
- [ ] reviewed tests and test coverage
- [ ] manually tested (if applicable)
* Skips very noisy benchmarks that end up running only for b.N=1 because
their entire time is spent in setup, and varying parameters doesn't change
much given that the number of stores is what dominates the expense. To
ensure we can provide reliable benchmarks, progressively for the project,
skip these until there is a proper re-work of what the benchmarks need to do
* Previously sub-benchmarks: b.Run(...) did not b.ReportAllocs() due to a faulty
assumption that invoking b.ReportAllocs() at the top would be inherited by
all sub-benchmarks. This change fixes that
Fixes#8779Fixes#8855
Co-authored-by: Alessio Treglia <alessio@tendermint.com>
Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
With this change, we'll get details on the number of
allocations performed by code. Later on when we have
continuous benchmarking infrastructure, this change
will prove useful to flag regressions.
Fixes#8459
Co-authored-by: Alessio Treglia <alessio@tendermint.com>
MD Aleem
Emmanuel T Odeke
Alexander Bezobchuk
Kevin Davis
colin axner
Federico Kunze