674 lines
15 KiB
Go
674 lines
15 KiB
Go
package unknownproto
|
|
|
|
import (
|
|
"reflect"
|
|
"testing"
|
|
|
|
"github.com/stretchr/testify/require"
|
|
|
|
"github.com/gogo/protobuf/proto"
|
|
|
|
"github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/codec/types"
|
|
"github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/testutil/testdata"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
func TestRejectUnknownFieldsRepeated(t *testing.T) {
|
|
tests := []struct {
|
|
name string
|
|
in proto.Message
|
|
recv proto.Message
|
|
wantErr error
|
|
allowUnknownNonCriticals bool
|
|
hasUnknownNonCriticals bool
|
|
}{
|
|
{
|
|
name: "Unknown field in midst of repeated values",
|
|
in: &testdata.TestVersion2{
|
|
C: []*testdata.TestVersion2{
|
|
{
|
|
C: []*testdata.TestVersion2{
|
|
{
|
|
Sum: &testdata.TestVersion2_F{
|
|
F: &testdata.TestVersion2{
|
|
A: &testdata.TestVersion2{
|
|
B: &testdata.TestVersion2{
|
|
H: []*testdata.TestVersion1{
|
|
{
|
|
X: 0x01,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
Sum: &testdata.TestVersion2_F{
|
|
F: &testdata.TestVersion2{
|
|
A: &testdata.TestVersion2{
|
|
B: &testdata.TestVersion2{
|
|
H: []*testdata.TestVersion1{
|
|
{
|
|
X: 0x02,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
Sum: &testdata.TestVersion2_F{
|
|
F: &testdata.TestVersion2{
|
|
NewField: 411,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
recv: new(testdata.TestVersion1),
|
|
wantErr: &errUnknownField{
|
|
Type: "*testdata.TestVersion1",
|
|
TagNum: 25,
|
|
WireType: 0,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "Unknown field in midst of repeated values, allowUnknownNonCriticals set",
|
|
allowUnknownNonCriticals: true,
|
|
in: &testdata.TestVersion2{
|
|
C: []*testdata.TestVersion2{
|
|
{
|
|
C: []*testdata.TestVersion2{
|
|
{
|
|
Sum: &testdata.TestVersion2_F{
|
|
F: &testdata.TestVersion2{
|
|
A: &testdata.TestVersion2{
|
|
B: &testdata.TestVersion2{
|
|
H: []*testdata.TestVersion1{
|
|
{
|
|
X: 0x01,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
Sum: &testdata.TestVersion2_F{
|
|
F: &testdata.TestVersion2{
|
|
A: &testdata.TestVersion2{
|
|
B: &testdata.TestVersion2{
|
|
H: []*testdata.TestVersion1{
|
|
{
|
|
X: 0x02,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
Sum: &testdata.TestVersion2_F{
|
|
F: &testdata.TestVersion2{
|
|
NewField: 411,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
recv: new(testdata.TestVersion1),
|
|
wantErr: &errUnknownField{
|
|
Type: "*testdata.TestVersion1",
|
|
TagNum: 25,
|
|
WireType: 0,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "Unknown field in midst of repeated values, non-critical field to be rejected",
|
|
in: &testdata.TestVersion3{
|
|
C: []*testdata.TestVersion3{
|
|
{
|
|
C: []*testdata.TestVersion3{
|
|
{
|
|
Sum: &testdata.TestVersion3_F{
|
|
F: &testdata.TestVersion3{
|
|
A: &testdata.TestVersion3{
|
|
B: &testdata.TestVersion3{
|
|
X: 0x01,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
Sum: &testdata.TestVersion3_F{
|
|
F: &testdata.TestVersion3{
|
|
A: &testdata.TestVersion3{
|
|
B: &testdata.TestVersion3{
|
|
X: 0x02,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
Sum: &testdata.TestVersion3_F{
|
|
F: &testdata.TestVersion3{
|
|
NonCriticalField: "non-critical",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
recv: new(testdata.TestVersion1),
|
|
wantErr: &errUnknownField{
|
|
Type: "*testdata.TestVersion1",
|
|
TagNum: 1031,
|
|
WireType: 2,
|
|
},
|
|
hasUnknownNonCriticals: true,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "Unknown field in midst of repeated values, non-critical field ignored",
|
|
allowUnknownNonCriticals: true,
|
|
in: &testdata.TestVersion3{
|
|
C: []*testdata.TestVersion3{
|
|
{
|
|
C: []*testdata.TestVersion3{
|
|
{
|
|
Sum: &testdata.TestVersion3_F{
|
|
F: &testdata.TestVersion3{
|
|
A: &testdata.TestVersion3{
|
|
B: &testdata.TestVersion3{
|
|
X: 0x01,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
Sum: &testdata.TestVersion3_F{
|
|
F: &testdata.TestVersion3{
|
|
A: &testdata.TestVersion3{
|
|
B: &testdata.TestVersion3{
|
|
X: 0x02,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
Sum: &testdata.TestVersion3_F{
|
|
F: &testdata.TestVersion3{
|
|
NonCriticalField: "non-critical",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
recv: new(testdata.TestVersion1),
|
|
wantErr: nil,
|
|
hasUnknownNonCriticals: true,
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for _, tt := range tests {
|
|
tt := tt
|
|
t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
protoBlob, err := proto.Marshal(tt.in)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatal(err)
|
|
}
|
|
hasUnknownNonCriticals, gotErr := RejectUnknownFields(protoBlob, tt.recv, tt.allowUnknownNonCriticals, DefaultAnyResolver{})
|
|
require.Equal(t, tt.wantErr, gotErr)
|
|
require.Equal(t, tt.hasUnknownNonCriticals, hasUnknownNonCriticals)
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestRejectUnknownFields_allowUnknownNonCriticals(t *testing.T) {
|
|
tests := []struct {
|
|
name string
|
|
in proto.Message
|
|
allowUnknownNonCriticals bool
|
|
wantErr error
|
|
}{
|
|
{
|
|
name: "Field that's in the reserved range, should fail by default",
|
|
in: &testdata.Customer2{
|
|
Id: 289,
|
|
Reserved: 99,
|
|
},
|
|
wantErr: &errUnknownField{
|
|
Type: "*testdata.Customer1",
|
|
TagNum: 1047,
|
|
WireType: 0,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "Field that's in the reserved range, toggle allowUnknownNonCriticals",
|
|
allowUnknownNonCriticals: true,
|
|
in: &testdata.Customer2{
|
|
Id: 289,
|
|
Reserved: 99,
|
|
},
|
|
wantErr: nil,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "Unknown fields that are critical, but with allowUnknownNonCriticals set",
|
|
allowUnknownNonCriticals: true,
|
|
in: &testdata.Customer2{
|
|
Id: 289,
|
|
City: testdata.Customer2_PaloAlto,
|
|
},
|
|
wantErr: &errUnknownField{
|
|
Type: "*testdata.Customer1",
|
|
TagNum: 6,
|
|
WireType: 0,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for _, tt := range tests {
|
|
tt := tt
|
|
t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
blob, err := proto.Marshal(tt.in)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("Failed to marshal input: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
c1 := new(testdata.Customer1)
|
|
_, gotErr := RejectUnknownFields(blob, c1, tt.allowUnknownNonCriticals, DefaultAnyResolver{})
|
|
if !reflect.DeepEqual(gotErr, tt.wantErr) {
|
|
t.Fatalf("Error mismatch\nGot:\n%s\n\nWant:\n%s", gotErr, tt.wantErr)
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestRejectUnknownFieldsNested(t *testing.T) {
|
|
tests := []struct {
|
|
name string
|
|
in proto.Message
|
|
recv proto.Message
|
|
wantErr error
|
|
}{
|
|
{
|
|
name: "TestVersion3 from TestVersionFD1",
|
|
in: &testdata.TestVersion2{
|
|
X: 5,
|
|
Sum: &testdata.TestVersion2_E{
|
|
E: 100,
|
|
},
|
|
H: []*testdata.TestVersion1{
|
|
{X: 999},
|
|
{X: -55},
|
|
{
|
|
X: 102,
|
|
Sum: &testdata.TestVersion1_F{
|
|
F: &testdata.TestVersion1{
|
|
X: 4,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
Customer1: &testdata.Customer1{
|
|
Id: 45,
|
|
Name: "customer1",
|
|
SubscriptionFee: 99,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
recv: new(testdata.TestVersionFD1),
|
|
wantErr: &errUnknownField{
|
|
Type: "*testdata.TestVersionFD1",
|
|
TagNum: 12,
|
|
WireType: 2,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "Alternating oneofs",
|
|
in: &testdata.TestVersion3{
|
|
Sum: &testdata.TestVersion3_E{
|
|
E: 99,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
recv: new(testdata.TestVersion3LoneOneOfValue),
|
|
wantErr: nil,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "Alternating oneofs mismatched field",
|
|
in: &testdata.TestVersion3{
|
|
Sum: &testdata.TestVersion3_F{
|
|
F: &testdata.TestVersion3{
|
|
X: 99,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
recv: new(testdata.TestVersion3LoneOneOfValue),
|
|
wantErr: &errUnknownField{
|
|
Type: "*testdata.TestVersion3LoneOneOfValue",
|
|
TagNum: 7,
|
|
WireType: 2,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "Discrepancy in a deeply nested one of field",
|
|
in: &testdata.TestVersion3{
|
|
Sum: &testdata.TestVersion3_F{
|
|
F: &testdata.TestVersion3{
|
|
Sum: &testdata.TestVersion3_F{
|
|
F: &testdata.TestVersion3{
|
|
X: 19,
|
|
Sum: &testdata.TestVersion3_E{
|
|
E: 99,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
recv: new(testdata.TestVersion3LoneNesting),
|
|
wantErr: &errUnknownField{
|
|
Type: "*testdata.TestVersion3LoneNesting",
|
|
TagNum: 6,
|
|
WireType: 0,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "unknown field types.Any in G",
|
|
in: &testdata.TestVersion3{
|
|
G: &types.Any{
|
|
TypeUrl: "/testdata.TestVersion1",
|
|
Value: mustMarshal(&testdata.TestVersion2{
|
|
Sum: &testdata.TestVersion2_F{
|
|
F: &testdata.TestVersion2{
|
|
NewField: 999,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
}),
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
recv: new(testdata.TestVersion3),
|
|
wantErr: &errUnknownField{
|
|
Type: "*testdata.TestVersion1",
|
|
TagNum: 25,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "types.Any with extra fields",
|
|
in: &testdata.TestVersionFD1WithExtraAny{
|
|
G: &testdata.AnyWithExtra{
|
|
Any: &types.Any{
|
|
TypeUrl: "/testdata.TestVersion1",
|
|
Value: mustMarshal(&testdata.TestVersion2{
|
|
Sum: &testdata.TestVersion2_F{
|
|
F: &testdata.TestVersion2{
|
|
NewField: 999,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
}),
|
|
},
|
|
B: 3,
|
|
C: 2,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
recv: new(testdata.TestVersion3),
|
|
wantErr: &errUnknownField{
|
|
Type: "*types.Any",
|
|
TagNum: 3,
|
|
WireType: 0,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "mismatched types.Any in G",
|
|
in: &testdata.TestVersion1{
|
|
G: &types.Any{
|
|
TypeUrl: "/testdata.TestVersion4LoneNesting",
|
|
Value: mustMarshal(&testdata.TestVersion3LoneNesting_Inner1{
|
|
Inner: &testdata.TestVersion3LoneNesting_Inner1_InnerInner{
|
|
Id: "ID",
|
|
City: "Gotham",
|
|
},
|
|
}),
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
recv: new(testdata.TestVersion1),
|
|
wantErr: &errMismatchedWireType{
|
|
Type: "*testdata.TestVersion3",
|
|
TagNum: 8,
|
|
GotWireType: 7,
|
|
WantWireType: 2,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "From nested proto message, message index 0",
|
|
in: &testdata.TestVersion3LoneNesting{
|
|
Inner1: &testdata.TestVersion3LoneNesting_Inner1{
|
|
Id: 10,
|
|
Name: "foo",
|
|
Inner: &testdata.TestVersion3LoneNesting_Inner1_InnerInner{
|
|
Id: "ID",
|
|
City: "Palo Alto",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
recv: new(testdata.TestVersion4LoneNesting),
|
|
wantErr: nil,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "From nested proto message, message index 1",
|
|
in: &testdata.TestVersion3LoneNesting{
|
|
Inner2: &testdata.TestVersion3LoneNesting_Inner2{
|
|
Id: "ID",
|
|
Country: "Maldives",
|
|
Inner: &testdata.TestVersion3LoneNesting_Inner2_InnerInner{
|
|
Id: "ID",
|
|
City: "Unknown",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
recv: new(testdata.TestVersion4LoneNesting),
|
|
wantErr: nil,
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for _, tt := range tests {
|
|
tt := tt
|
|
t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
protoBlob, err := proto.Marshal(tt.in)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatal(err)
|
|
}
|
|
gotErr := RejectUnknownFieldsStrict(protoBlob, tt.recv, DefaultAnyResolver{})
|
|
if !reflect.DeepEqual(gotErr, tt.wantErr) {
|
|
t.Fatalf("Error mismatch\nGot:\n%s\n\nWant:\n%s", gotErr, tt.wantErr)
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestRejectUnknownFieldsFlat(t *testing.T) {
|
|
tests := []struct {
|
|
name string
|
|
in proto.Message
|
|
wantErr error
|
|
}{
|
|
{
|
|
name: "Oneof with same field number, shouldn't complain",
|
|
in: &testdata.Customer3{
|
|
Id: 68,
|
|
Name: "ACME3",
|
|
Payment: &testdata.Customer3_CreditCardNo{
|
|
CreditCardNo: "123-XXXX-XXX881",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
wantErr: nil,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "Oneof with different field number, should fail",
|
|
in: &testdata.Customer3{
|
|
Id: 68,
|
|
Name: "ACME3",
|
|
Payment: &testdata.Customer3_ChequeNo{
|
|
ChequeNo: "123XXXXXXX881",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
wantErr: &errUnknownField{
|
|
Type: "*testdata.Customer1",
|
|
TagNum: 8, WireType: 2,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "Any in a field, the extra field will be serialized so should fail",
|
|
in: &testdata.Customer2{
|
|
Miscellaneous: &types.Any{},
|
|
},
|
|
wantErr: &errUnknownField{
|
|
Type: "*testdata.Customer1",
|
|
TagNum: 10,
|
|
WireType: 2,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "With a nested struct as a field",
|
|
in: &testdata.Customer3{
|
|
Id: 289,
|
|
Original: &testdata.Customer1{
|
|
Id: 991,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
wantErr: &errUnknownField{
|
|
Type: "*testdata.Customer1",
|
|
TagNum: 9,
|
|
WireType: 2,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "An extra field that's non-existent in Customer1",
|
|
in: &testdata.Customer2{
|
|
Id: 289,
|
|
Name: "Customer1",
|
|
Industry: 5299,
|
|
Fewer: 199.9,
|
|
},
|
|
wantErr: &errMismatchedWireType{
|
|
Type: "*testdata.Customer1",
|
|
TagNum: 2, GotWireType: 0, WantWireType: 2,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "Using a field that's in the reserved range, should fail by default",
|
|
in: &testdata.Customer2{
|
|
Id: 289,
|
|
Reserved: 99,
|
|
},
|
|
wantErr: &errUnknownField{
|
|
Type: "*testdata.Customer1",
|
|
TagNum: 1047,
|
|
WireType: 0,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "Only fields matching",
|
|
in: &testdata.Customer2{
|
|
Id: 289,
|
|
Name: "Customer1",
|
|
},
|
|
wantErr: &errMismatchedWireType{
|
|
Type: "*testdata.Customer1",
|
|
TagNum: 3, GotWireType: 2, WantWireType: 5,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "Extra field that's non-existent in Customer1, along with Reserved set",
|
|
in: &testdata.Customer2{
|
|
Id: 289,
|
|
Name: "Customer1",
|
|
Industry: 5299,
|
|
Fewer: 199.9,
|
|
Reserved: 819,
|
|
},
|
|
wantErr: &errMismatchedWireType{
|
|
Type: "*testdata.Customer1",
|
|
TagNum: 2, GotWireType: 0, WantWireType: 2,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "Using enumerated field",
|
|
in: &testdata.Customer2{
|
|
Id: 289,
|
|
Name: "Customer1",
|
|
Industry: 5299,
|
|
City: testdata.Customer2_PaloAlto,
|
|
},
|
|
wantErr: &errMismatchedWireType{
|
|
Type: "*testdata.Customer1",
|
|
TagNum: 2,
|
|
GotWireType: 0, WantWireType: 2,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "multiple extraneous fields",
|
|
in: &testdata.Customer2{
|
|
Id: 289,
|
|
Name: "Customer1",
|
|
Industry: 5299,
|
|
City: testdata.Customer2_PaloAlto,
|
|
Fewer: 45,
|
|
},
|
|
wantErr: &errMismatchedWireType{
|
|
TagNum: 2, GotWireType: 0, WantWireType: 2,
|
|
Type: "*testdata.Customer1",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for _, tt := range tests {
|
|
tt := tt
|
|
t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
blob, err := proto.Marshal(tt.in)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("Failed to marshal input: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
c1 := new(testdata.Customer1)
|
|
gotErr := RejectUnknownFieldsStrict(blob, c1, DefaultAnyResolver{})
|
|
if !reflect.DeepEqual(gotErr, tt.wantErr) {
|
|
t.Fatalf("Error mismatch\nGot:\n%s\n\nWant:\n%s", gotErr, tt.wantErr)
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Issue https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/issues/7222, we need to ensure that repeated
|
|
// uint64 are recognized as packed.
|
|
func TestPackedEncoding(t *testing.T) {
|
|
data := testdata.TestRepeatedUints{Nums: []uint64{12, 13}}
|
|
|
|
marshalled, err := data.Marshal()
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
unmarshalled := &testdata.TestRepeatedUints{}
|
|
_, err = RejectUnknownFields(marshalled, unmarshalled, false, DefaultAnyResolver{})
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func mustMarshal(msg proto.Message) []byte {
|
|
blob, err := proto.Marshal(msg)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
panic(err)
|
|
}
|
|
return blob
|
|
}
|