Commit Graph

14 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Ethan Buchman 3d00c477fc separate block vs state based validation 2017-12-21 16:49:47 -05:00
Anton Kaliaev 843e1ed400
Updates -> ValidatoSetUpdates 2017-12-19 13:03:39 -06:00
Ethan Frey 960b25408f Store LastConsensusHash in State as well
Update all BlockValidation that it matches the last state
2017-12-19 12:28:08 -05:00
Ethan Frey d151e36ea8 Add ConsensusHash to header 2017-12-19 12:28:08 -05:00
Ethan Buchman 068d83bce8
Merge pull request #677 from tendermint/blockchain-test-store
blockchain: add tests for BlockStore
2017-12-15 13:33:55 -05:00
Ethan Buchman 78a682e4b6 blockchain: test fixes 2017-12-15 12:07:48 -05:00
Ethan Frey dedf03bb81 Add TotalTx to block header, issue #952
Update state to keep track of this info.
Change function args as needed.
Make NumTx also an int64 for consistency.
2017-12-13 12:20:53 +01:00
Emmanuel Odeke 2da5299924 blockchain: less fragile and involved tests for blockstore
With feedback from @ebuchman, to make the tests nicer
and less fragile.
2017-12-10 19:58:22 -05:00
Anton Kaliaev 922af7c405
int64 height
uint64 is considered dangerous. the details will follow in a blog post.
2017-12-01 19:04:53 -06:00
Anton Kaliaev b3492356e6 uint64 height (Refs #911) 2017-12-01 17:17:22 -05:00
Anton Kaliaev e06bbaf303
refactor TestNoBlockMessageResponse to eliminate a race condition 2017-10-24 15:32:01 +04:00
Anton Kaliaev 716364182d
[state] expose ChainID and Params
```
jaekwon
Yeah we should definitely expose ChainID.
ConsensusParams is small enough, we can just write it.
```
https://github.com/tendermint/tendermint/pull/676#discussion_r144123203
2017-10-16 10:34:02 +04:00
Ethan Buchman 659768783f blockchain: fixing reactor tests 2017-10-04 22:26:00 -04:00
Emmanuel Odeke 068f01368f blockchain/reactor: respondWithNoResponseMessage for missing height
Fixes #514
Replaces #540

If a peer requests a block with a height that we don't have
respond with a bcNoBlockResponseMessage.
However, according to the Tendermint spec, if all nodes are honest
this condition shouldn't occur, so this is a possible hint of an
dishonest node.
2017-10-04 17:27:10 -04:00