From 166853aed94484b327a89a2554312f6739fce8a9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: obscuren Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 20:35:23 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Test --- peer.go | 43 +++++++++++++++++-------------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) diff --git a/peer.go b/peer.go index 29f98a4fb..a509178d2 100644 --- a/peer.go +++ b/peer.go @@ -299,28 +299,6 @@ func (p *Peer) HandleInbound() { var block, lastBlock *ethchain.Block var err error - // 1. Compare the first block over the wire's prev-hash with the hash of your last block - // 2. If these two values are the same you can just link the chains together. - // [1:0,2:1,3:2] <- Current blocks (format block:previous_block) - // [1:0,2:1,3:2,4:3,5:4] <- incoming blocks - // == [1,2,3,4,5] - // 3. If the values are not the same we will have to go back and calculate the chain with the highest total difficulty - // [1:0,2:1,3:2,11:3,12:11,13:12] - // [1:0,2:1,3:2,4:3,5:4,6:5] - - // [3:2,11:3,12:11,13:12] - // [3:2,4:3,5:4,6:5] - // Heb ik dit blok? - // Nee: heb ik een blok met PrevHash 3? - // Ja: DIVERSION - // Nee; Adding to chain - - // See if we can find a common ancestor - // 1. Get the earliest block in the package. - // 2. Do we have this block? - // 3. Yes: Let's continue what we are doing - // 4. No: Let's request more blocks back. - // Make sure we are actually receiving anything if msg.Data.Len()-1 > 1 && p.catchingUp { // We requested blocks and now we need to make sure we have a common ancestor somewhere in these blocks so we can find @@ -342,8 +320,9 @@ func (p *Peer) HandleInbound() { if !p.ethereum.StateManager().BlockChain().HasBlock(block.Hash()) { // We don't have this block, but we do have a block with the same prevHash, diversion time! if p.ethereum.StateManager().BlockChain().HasBlockWithPrevHash(block.PrevHash) { - //ethutil.Config.Log.Infof("[PEER] Local and foreign chain have diverted after %x, finding best chain!\n", block.PrevHash) if p.ethereum.StateManager().BlockChain().FindCanonicalChainFromMsg(msg, block.PrevHash) { + p.catchingUp = false + return } } @@ -375,7 +354,8 @@ func (p *Peer) HandleInbound() { p.catchingUp = false p.CatchupWithPeer(p.ethereum.BlockChain().CurrentBlock.Hash()) } else if ethchain.IsValidationErr(err) { - // TODO + fmt.Println(err) + p.catchingUp = false } } else { // XXX Do we want to catch up if there were errors? @@ -385,12 +365,20 @@ func (p *Peer) HandleInbound() { blockInfo := lastBlock.BlockInfo() ethutil.Config.Log.Infof("Synced to block height #%d %x %x\n", blockInfo.Number, lastBlock.Hash(), blockInfo.Hash) } + p.catchingUp = false - p.CatchupWithPeer(p.ethereum.BlockChain().CurrentBlock.Hash()) + + hash := p.ethereum.BlockChain().CurrentBlock.Hash() + p.CatchupWithPeer(hash) } } - p.catchingUp = false + if lastBlock != nil && err == nil { + fmt.Println("Did proc. no err") + } else { + fmt.Println("other") + } + fmt.Println("length of chain", msg.Data.Len()) case ethwire.MsgTxTy: // If the message was a transaction queue the transaction // in the TxPool where it will undergo validation and @@ -453,7 +441,10 @@ func (p *Peer) HandleInbound() { if len(chain) > 0 { ethutil.Config.Log.Debugf("[PEER] Returning %d blocks: %x ", len(chain), parent.Hash()) p.QueueMessage(ethwire.NewMessage(ethwire.MsgBlockTy, chain)) + } else { + p.QueueMessage(ethwire.NewMessage(ethwire.MsgBlockTy, []interface{})) } + } else { ethutil.Config.Log.Debugf("[PEER] Could not find a similar block") // If no blocks are found we send back a reply with msg not in chain