rusefi
/
atbetaflight
mirror of https://github.com/rusefi/atbetaflight.git
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Update a misleading TPA chart 

The old version was pretty ambiguous so many people were confused with it.
This commit is contained in:
MITuritsyn 2022-04-26 14:02:48 +03:00 committed by GitHub
parent fe067615c2
commit 07faab5bf2
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
1 changed files with 3 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
docs/PID tuning.md
View File

@ -40,7 +40,9 @@ An Example: With TPA = 50 (or .5 in the GUI) and `tpa_breakpoint` = 1500 (assume
* At full throttle (2000) the full amount of dampening set in TPA is applied. (50% reduction in this example) * At full throttle (2000) the full amount of dampening set in TPA is applied. (50% reduction in this example)
* TPA can lead into increase of rotation rate when more throttle applied. You can get faster flips and rolls when more throttle applied due to coupling of PID's and rates. Only the PID controllers MWREWRITE and LUX are using a linear TPA implementation, where no rotation rates are affected when TPA is being used. * TPA can lead into increase of rotation rate when more throttle applied. You can get faster flips and rolls when more throttle applied due to coupling of PID's and rates. Only the PID controllers MWREWRITE and LUX are using a linear TPA implementation, where no rotation rates are affected when TPA is being used.
![tpa example chart](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/1668170/6053290/655255dc-ac92-11e4-9491-1a58d868c131.png "TPA Example Chart") ![tpa example chart](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/15355893/165283247-2c423404-56ea-44a6-aa93-ef309c316070.png "TPA Example Chart")
**How and Why to use this?** **How and Why to use this?**