look it's a bugfix!

java_tools/configuration_definition/src/main/java/com/rusefi/output/JavaSensorsConsumer.java

@@ -25,11 +25,7 @@ public class JavaSensorsConsumer implements ConfigurationConsumer {
                 ConfigField configField = iterator.cf;
                 ConfigField next = iterator.next;
 
-                if (configField.isBit()) {
-                    // do not support bits for now but need to account for size
-                    tsPosition += configField.getSize(next);
-                    return tsPosition;
-                }
+                if (!configField.isBit()) {
                     sb.append(configField.getName()).append("(");
 
                     String string = readerState.variableRegistry.applyVariables(configField.getComment());
@@ -56,8 +52,10 @@ public class JavaSensorsConsumer implements ConfigurationConsumer {
                     sb.append("\n");
 
 
+                }
                 tsPosition += configField.getSize(next);
                 // this value would be consumed by UsagesReader
+                // todo: too many variables that's fragile shall we move tsPosition to iterator state?
                 sensorTsPosition  = tsPosition;
 
                 return tsPosition;

java_tools/configuration_definition/src/test/java/com/rusefi/test/JavaSensorsConsumerTest.java

@@ -53,6 +53,6 @@ public class JavaSensorsConsumerTest {
         JavaSensorsConsumer javaSensorsConsumer = new JavaSensorsConsumer();
         state.readBufferedReader(outputChannels, javaSensorsConsumer);
 
-        assertEquals(0, javaSensorsConsumer.sensorTsPosition);
+        assertEquals(4, javaSensorsConsumer.sensorTsPosition);
     }
 }