A "with stack" implementation gains too little in performance to be
worth all the noise from C-stack overflows.
This commit is almost a sketch, to test performance. There are several
pending stuff:
- review control of C-stack overflow and error messages;
- what to do with setcstacklimit;
- review comments;
- review unroll of Lua calls.
The macro 'luaL_pushfail' documents all places in the standard libraries
that return nil to signal some kind of failure. It is defined as
'lua_pushnil'. The manual also got a notation (@fail) to document those
returns. The tests were changed to be agnostic regarding whether 'fail'
is 'nil' or 'false'.
"Better" and similar to error messages for invalid function arguments.
*old message: 'for' limit must be a number
*new message: bad 'for' limit (number expected, got table)
From the point of view of 'git', all names are relative to the root
directory of the project. So, file names in '$Id:' also should be
relative to that directory: the proper name for test file 'all.lua'
is 'testes/all.lua'.
When creating code for a jump on a 'not' condition, the code generator
was removing an instruction (the OP_NOT) without adjusting its
corresponding line information.
This fix also added tests for this case and extra functionality in
the test library to debug line info. structures.
Roberto Ierusalimschy