rusefi
/
rusefi_documentation
mirror of https://github.com/rusefi/rusefi_documentation.git
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

fix typos and md syntax

This commit is contained in:
mi-hol 2022-12-30 18:33:08 +01:00
parent 217e149c0a
commit 963271e041
3 changed files with 10 additions and 12 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
.vscode/settings.json vendored
View File

@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
"ELANTRA", "ELANTRA",
"Festiva", "Festiva",
"Frankenso", "Frankenso",
"FTDI",
"Galant", "Galant",
"GSXR", "GSXR",
"Haltech", "Haltech",
@ -43,6 +44,7 @@
"superseal", "superseal",
"Terrano", "Terrano",
"triggerinfo", "triggerinfo",
"tunerstudio",
"tyco", "tyco",
"Vitara", "Vitara",
"Vref", "Vref",

8
Common-Issues.md
View File

@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
## Protoboard does not show the ON light # Prototype board does not show the ON light
Isolate to only USB power by disconnecting from vehicle and plugging in to USB power. If that helps. There is probably a problem with the 12V power supply. Isolate to only USB power by disconnecting from vehicle and plugging in to USB power. If that helps. There is probably a problem with the 12V power supply.
Check the 3.3V LED Check the 3.3V LED.
## ON light is bright, but can not communiate over USB ## ON light is bright, but can not communicate over USB
Check that the FTDI driver is installed and that you find your COM port. Check that the FTDI driver is installed and that you find your COM port.
## Can't open Java console ## Can't open Java console

12
Connectivity.md
View File

@ -1,15 +1,12 @@
## Intro # Intro
rusEFI firmware currently supports two protocols for ECU monitoring & control rusEFI firmware currently supports two protocols for ECU monitoring & control
1. human-readable native protocol - connect to the ECU using HyperTerminal. This used to be protocol rusEFI console was using but not any more, we are moving towards not having text protocol enabled by default. 1. human-readable native protocol - connect to the ECU using HyperTerminal. This used to be protocol rusEFI console was using but not any more, we are moving towards not having text protocol enabled by default.
[List of commands](Dev-Console-Commands)
[List of commands](Dev-Console-Commands) [Java console code overview](Dev-Console-Implementation)
[Java console code overview](Dev-Console-Implementation)
2. binary protocol for integration with rusEFI console or [TunerStudio](http://www.tunerstudio.com/) tuning software 2. binary protocol for integration with rusEFI console or [TunerStudio](http://www.tunerstudio.com/) tuning software
See [tunerstudio.cpp](https://sourceforge.net/p/rusefi/code/HEAD/tree/trunk/firmware/console/binary/tunerstudio.cpp) for a brief description of this binary protocol See [tunerstudio.cpp](https://sourceforge.net/p/rusefi/code/HEAD/tree/trunk/firmware/console/binary/tunerstudio.cpp) for a brief description of this binary protocol
@ -17,13 +14,12 @@ See [tunerstudio.cpp](https://sourceforge.net/p/rusefi/code/HEAD/tree/trunk/firm
For physical level rs232 is used ("serial port") - either via a FL232 chip or by emulating a USB device right within stm32f4. A bluetooth option is also available. For physical level rs232 is used ("serial port") - either via a FL232 chip or by emulating a USB device right within stm32f4. A bluetooth option is also available.
![FTDI IC pads](Images/ftdi.png) ![FTDI IC pads](Images/ftdi.png)
[Forum thread](http://rusefi.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=210) [Forum thread](http://rusefi.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=210)
## Q&A ## Q&A
Q: Why two protocols? can you achieve the same results using both protocols? Q: Why two protocols? can you achieve the same results using both protocols?
A: Not really. Our text-based protocol has support for human-readable messages and it handles our own build-in logic anayzer - it is better for troubleshooting. A: Not really. Our text-based protocol has support for human-readable messages and it handles our own build-in logic analyzer - it is better for troubleshooting.
The protocol has better support for engine tuning in terms of editing individual cells on fuel maps etc. The protocol has better support for engine tuning in terms of editing individual cells on fuel maps etc.
Q: Is the binary protocol compatible with MegaSquirt? Q: Is the binary protocol compatible with MegaSquirt?