Issue #1851 shows that a zaddr->taddr can be rejected from mempools
due to not meeting fee requirements given the size of the transaction.
Fee calculation for joinsplit txs has not yet been agreed upon, so
during this interim period, this patch ensures joinsplit txs using
the default fee are not rejected due to an insufficient fee.
Commit 2eeb6b randomized the order of input and output notes,
but this is now known to prevent the chaining of multiple joinsplits
in a single transaction. The root cause has yet to be determined.
This patch is a temporary fix and disables the shuffling of input
and output notes. It also adds a chained joinsplit test to the
python qa test suite.
Add z_sendmany rule that when coinbase utxos must be spent in their entirety, with no change
See #1616 - coinbase utxos must be consumed entirely, without any change, since there
is currently no way to specify a change address in z_sendmany.
Fix issue where z_sendmany amount parameter is too strict
Upstream treats an amount parameter of `1` the same as `1.0`. Third-party would like this fixed.
Return a more informative error message when trying to spend coinbase; select non-coinbase inputs when sending to a transparent output if needed
For #1373 and #1519
Code change:
- Extra parameter added to AvailableCoins to include or exclude Coinbase coins. Default value of parameter is 'true' as current behaviour is to include Coinbase coins.
- SelectCoins, used for sending taddr->taddr, will now exclude Coinbase coins.
Unit test:
Tried to write a test to focus on the extra parameter added to AvailableCoins but could not.
Empirical testing on Testnet:
Current behaviour is that upstream RPC commands sendfrom and sendtoaddress try to spend coinbase coins returned by AvailableCoins. So the user will see:
```
./zcash-cli sendtoaddress mrEGRmGJhmwAa4MQjzGd86ry63vrvovu9b 1000.0
error: {"code":-6,"message":"Insufficient funds"}
./zcash-cli sendtoaddress mrEGRmGJhmwAa4MQjzGd86ry63vrvovu9b 0.00003000
error: {"code":-4,"message":"Error: The transaction was rejected! This might happen if some of the coins in your wallet were already spent, such as if you used a copy of wallet.dat and coins were spent in the copy but not marked as spent here."}
./zcash-cli sendfrom "" mrEGRmGJhmwAa4MQjzGd86ry63vrvovu9b 0.00003000
error: {"code":-4,"message":"Error: The transaction was rejected! This might happen if some of the coins in your wallet were already spent, such as if you used a copy of wallet.dat and coins were spent in the copy but not marked as spent here."}
```
After fix is applied:
```
./zcash-cli sendtoaddress mrEGRmGJhmwAa4MQjzGd86ry63vrvovu9b 1000.0
error: {"code":-6,"message":"Insufficient funds"}
./zcash-cli sendtoaddress mrEGRmGJhmwAa4MQjzGd86ry63vrvovu9b 0.00003000
error: {"code":-4,"message":"Coinbase funds can only be sent to a zaddr"}
```
When non-coinbase UTXOs exist, they will now be selected and used:
```
./zcash-cli z_sendmany tnPJZHeVxegCg91utaquBRPEDBGjozfz9iLDHt7zvphFbZdspNgkTVLCGjDcadQBKNyUwKs8pNjDXuEZKrE1aNLpFwHgz4t '[{"address":"mx5fTRhLZwbYE7ZqhAPueZgQGSnwTbdvKU", "amount":0.01}]'
./zcash-cli sendtoaddress mrEGRmGJhmwAa4MQjzGd86ry63vrvovu9b 1000.0
error: {"code":-6,"message":"Insufficient funds"}
./zcash-cli sendtoaddress mrEGRmGJhmwAa4MQjzGd86ry63vrvovu9b 0.00003000
9818e543ac2f689d4ce8b52087607d73fecd771d45d316a1d9db092f0485aff2
./zcash-cli sendfrom "" mrEGRmGJhmwAa4MQjzGd86ry63vrvovu9b 0.00003000
899f2894823f51f15fc73b5e0871ac943edbe0ff88e1635f86906087b72caf30
```
Extra parameter added to AvailableCoins to include or exclude Coinbase coins.
SelectCoins, used for sending taddr->taddr, will exclude Coinbase coins.
Added qa rpc test and a runtime parameter -regtestprotectcoinbase to enforce
the coinbase->zaddr consensus rule in regtest mode.
Since the parameters changed in z8, the benchmark on speed.z.cash is showing misleading results due to variability. (The quartile and extrema bars will still show the variability with 50 runs, they just won't jump around as much between benchmark data points.)
The genesis blocks and miner tests have been regenerated, because changing the
block header serialisation format changes the block hash, and thus validity.
The Equihash solutions have been removed from the bloom test inputs for
simplicity (block validity is not checked there; only a valid serialisation is
necessary).
Simon
zkbot
Sean Bowe
Jack Grigg
Daira Hopwood
Taylor Hornby