Merge pull request #121 from zcash/shardtree-justify-unwraps-v0.3.x-backport
Backport #119 to shardtree v0.3.x
This commit is contained in:
commit
c8ce5ef0a6
|
@ -177,7 +177,11 @@ impl<H: Hashable + Clone + PartialEq> LocatedPrunableTree<H> {
|
|||
// construct the subtree and cap based on the frontier containing the
|
||||
// witnessed position
|
||||
let (past_subtree, past_supertree) = self.insert_frontier_nodes::<C>(
|
||||
witness.tree().to_frontier().take().unwrap(),
|
||||
witness
|
||||
.tree()
|
||||
.to_frontier()
|
||||
.take()
|
||||
.expect("IncrementalWitness must not be created from the empty tree."),
|
||||
&Retention::Marked,
|
||||
)?;
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -392,13 +392,16 @@ impl<
|
|||
|
||||
/// Adds a checkpoint at the rightmost leaf state of the tree.
|
||||
pub fn checkpoint(&mut self, checkpoint_id: C) -> Result<bool, ShardTreeError<S::Error>> {
|
||||
/// Pre-condition: `root_addr` must be the address of `root`.
|
||||
fn go<H: Hashable + Clone + PartialEq>(
|
||||
root_addr: Address,
|
||||
root: &PrunableTree<H>,
|
||||
) -> Option<(PrunableTree<H>, Position)> {
|
||||
match root {
|
||||
Tree(Node::Parent { ann, left, right }) => {
|
||||
let (l_addr, r_addr) = root_addr.children().unwrap();
|
||||
let (l_addr, r_addr) = root_addr
|
||||
.children()
|
||||
.expect("has children because we checked `root` is a parent");
|
||||
go(r_addr, right).map_or_else(
|
||||
|| {
|
||||
go(l_addr, left).map(|(new_left, pos)| {
|
||||
|
@ -750,7 +753,10 @@ impl<
|
|||
// Compute the roots of the left and right children and hash them together.
|
||||
// We skip computation in any subtrees that will not have data included in
|
||||
// the final result.
|
||||
let (l_addr, r_addr) = cap.root_addr.children().unwrap();
|
||||
let (l_addr, r_addr) = cap
|
||||
.root_addr
|
||||
.children()
|
||||
.expect("has children because we checked `cap.root` is a parent");
|
||||
let l_result = if r_addr.contains(&target_addr) {
|
||||
None
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
|
@ -1103,7 +1109,8 @@ impl<
|
|||
cur_addr = cur_addr.parent();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Ok(MerklePath::from_parts(witness, position).unwrap())
|
||||
Ok(MerklePath::from_parts(witness, position)
|
||||
.expect("witness has length DEPTH because we extended it to the root"))
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn witness_internal(
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -120,7 +120,9 @@ impl<H: Hashable + Clone + PartialEq> PrunableTree<H> {
|
|||
|| {
|
||||
// Compute the roots of the left and right children and hash them
|
||||
// together.
|
||||
let (l_addr, r_addr) = root_addr.children().unwrap();
|
||||
let (l_addr, r_addr) = root_addr
|
||||
.children()
|
||||
.expect("The root address of a parent node must have children.");
|
||||
accumulate_result_with(
|
||||
left.root_hash(l_addr, truncate_at),
|
||||
right.root_hash(r_addr, truncate_at),
|
||||
|
@ -207,6 +209,7 @@ impl<H: Hashable + Clone + PartialEq> PrunableTree<H> {
|
|||
/// would cause information loss or if a conflict between root hashes occurs at a node. The
|
||||
/// returned error contains the address of the node where such a conflict occurred.
|
||||
pub fn merge_checked(self, root_addr: Address, other: Self) -> Result<Self, Address> {
|
||||
/// Pre-condition: `root_addr` must be the address of `t0` and `t1`.
|
||||
#[allow(clippy::type_complexity)]
|
||||
fn go<H: Hashable + Clone + PartialEq>(
|
||||
addr: Address,
|
||||
|
@ -261,7 +264,9 @@ impl<H: Hashable + Clone + PartialEq> PrunableTree<H> {
|
|||
}),
|
||||
) = (lparent, rparent)
|
||||
{
|
||||
let (l_addr, r_addr) = addr.children().unwrap();
|
||||
let (l_addr, r_addr) = addr
|
||||
.children()
|
||||
.expect("The root address of a parent node must have children.");
|
||||
Ok(Tree::unite(
|
||||
addr.level() - 1,
|
||||
lann.or(rann),
|
||||
|
@ -357,6 +362,7 @@ impl<H: Hashable + Clone + PartialEq> LocatedPrunableTree<H> {
|
|||
|
||||
/// Returns the positions of marked leaves in the tree.
|
||||
pub fn marked_positions(&self) -> BTreeSet<Position> {
|
||||
/// Pre-condition: `root_addr` must be the address of `root`.
|
||||
fn go<H: Hashable + Clone + PartialEq>(
|
||||
root_addr: Address,
|
||||
root: &PrunableTree<H>,
|
||||
|
@ -364,7 +370,9 @@ impl<H: Hashable + Clone + PartialEq> LocatedPrunableTree<H> {
|
|||
) {
|
||||
match &root.0 {
|
||||
Node::Parent { left, right, .. } => {
|
||||
let (l_addr, r_addr) = root_addr.children().unwrap();
|
||||
let (l_addr, r_addr) = root_addr
|
||||
.children()
|
||||
.expect("has children because we checked `root` is a parent");
|
||||
go(l_addr, left.as_ref(), acc);
|
||||
go(r_addr, right.as_ref(), acc);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -391,8 +399,10 @@ impl<H: Hashable + Clone + PartialEq> LocatedPrunableTree<H> {
|
|||
/// Returns either the witness for the leaf at the specified position, or an error that
|
||||
/// describes the causes of failure.
|
||||
pub fn witness(&self, position: Position, truncate_at: Position) -> Result<Vec<H>, QueryError> {
|
||||
// traverse down to the desired leaf position, and then construct
|
||||
// the authentication path on the way back up.
|
||||
/// Traverse down to the desired leaf position, and then construct
|
||||
/// the authentication path on the way back up.
|
||||
//
|
||||
/// Pre-condition: `root_addr` must be the address of `root`.
|
||||
fn go<H: Hashable + Clone + PartialEq>(
|
||||
root: &PrunableTree<H>,
|
||||
root_addr: Address,
|
||||
|
@ -401,7 +411,9 @@ impl<H: Hashable + Clone + PartialEq> LocatedPrunableTree<H> {
|
|||
) -> Result<Vec<H>, Vec<Address>> {
|
||||
match &root.0 {
|
||||
Node::Parent { left, right, .. } => {
|
||||
let (l_addr, r_addr) = root_addr.children().unwrap();
|
||||
let (l_addr, r_addr) = root_addr
|
||||
.children()
|
||||
.expect("has children because we checked `root` is a parent");
|
||||
if root_addr.level() > 1.into() {
|
||||
let r_start = r_addr.position_range_start();
|
||||
if position < r_start {
|
||||
|
@ -476,6 +488,7 @@ impl<H: Hashable + Clone + PartialEq> LocatedPrunableTree<H> {
|
|||
/// subtree root with the specified position as its maximum position exists, or `None`
|
||||
/// otherwise.
|
||||
pub fn truncate_to_position(&self, position: Position) -> Option<Self> {
|
||||
/// Pre-condition: `root_addr` must be the address of `root`.
|
||||
fn go<H: Hashable + Clone + PartialEq>(
|
||||
position: Position,
|
||||
root_addr: Address,
|
||||
|
@ -483,7 +496,9 @@ impl<H: Hashable + Clone + PartialEq> LocatedPrunableTree<H> {
|
|||
) -> Option<PrunableTree<H>> {
|
||||
match &root.0 {
|
||||
Node::Parent { ann, left, right } => {
|
||||
let (l_child, r_child) = root_addr.children().unwrap();
|
||||
let (l_child, r_child) = root_addr
|
||||
.children()
|
||||
.expect("has children because we checked `root` is a parent");
|
||||
if position < r_child.position_range_start() {
|
||||
// we are truncating within the range of the left node, so recurse
|
||||
// to the left to truncate the left child and then reconstruct the
|
||||
|
@ -537,8 +552,10 @@ impl<H: Hashable + Clone + PartialEq> LocatedPrunableTree<H> {
|
|||
subtree: Self,
|
||||
contains_marked: bool,
|
||||
) -> Result<(Self, Vec<IncompleteAt>), InsertionError> {
|
||||
// A function to recursively dig into the tree, creating a path downward and introducing
|
||||
// empty nodes as necessary until we can insert the provided subtree.
|
||||
/// A function to recursively dig into the tree, creating a path downward and introducing
|
||||
/// empty nodes as necessary until we can insert the provided subtree.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Pre-condition: `root_addr` must be the address of `into`.
|
||||
#[allow(clippy::type_complexity)]
|
||||
fn go<H: Hashable + Clone + PartialEq>(
|
||||
root_addr: Address,
|
||||
|
@ -621,7 +638,9 @@ impl<H: Hashable + Clone + PartialEq> LocatedPrunableTree<H> {
|
|||
Tree(Node::Parent { ann, left, right }) => {
|
||||
// In this case, we have an existing parent but we need to dig down farther
|
||||
// before we can insert the subtree that we're carrying for insertion.
|
||||
let (l_addr, r_addr) = root_addr.children().unwrap();
|
||||
let (l_addr, r_addr) = root_addr
|
||||
.children()
|
||||
.expect("has children because we checked `into` is a parent");
|
||||
if l_addr.contains(&subtree.root_addr) {
|
||||
let (new_left, incomplete) =
|
||||
go(l_addr, left.as_ref(), subtree, is_complete, contains_marked)?;
|
||||
|
@ -696,7 +715,12 @@ impl<H: Hashable + Clone + PartialEq> LocatedPrunableTree<H> {
|
|||
if r.remainder.next().is_some() {
|
||||
Err(InsertionError::TreeFull)
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
Ok((r.subtree, r.max_insert_position.unwrap(), checkpoint_id))
|
||||
Ok((
|
||||
r.subtree,
|
||||
r.max_insert_position
|
||||
.expect("Batch insertion result position is never initialized to None"),
|
||||
checkpoint_id,
|
||||
))
|
||||
}
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -820,6 +844,7 @@ impl<H: Hashable + Clone + PartialEq> LocatedPrunableTree<H> {
|
|||
/// Clears the specified retention flags at all positions specified, pruning any branches
|
||||
/// that no longer need to be retained.
|
||||
pub fn clear_flags(&self, to_clear: BTreeMap<Position, RetentionFlags>) -> Self {
|
||||
/// Pre-condition: `root_addr` must be the address of `root`.
|
||||
fn go<H: Hashable + Clone + PartialEq>(
|
||||
to_clear: &[(Position, RetentionFlags)],
|
||||
root_addr: Address,
|
||||
|
@ -831,7 +856,9 @@ impl<H: Hashable + Clone + PartialEq> LocatedPrunableTree<H> {
|
|||
} else {
|
||||
match root {
|
||||
Tree(Node::Parent { ann, left, right }) => {
|
||||
let (l_addr, r_addr) = root_addr.children().unwrap();
|
||||
let (l_addr, r_addr) = root_addr
|
||||
.children()
|
||||
.expect("has children because we checked `root` is a parent");
|
||||
|
||||
let p = to_clear.partition_point(|(p, _)| p < &l_addr.position_range_end());
|
||||
trace!(
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -46,9 +46,11 @@ where
|
|||
let _ = cache.put_cap(backend.get_cap()?);
|
||||
|
||||
backend.with_checkpoints(backend.checkpoint_count()?, |checkpoint_id, checkpoint| {
|
||||
// TODO: Once MSRV is at least 1.82, replace this (and similar `expect()`s below) with:
|
||||
// `let Ok(_) = cache.add_checkpoint(checkpoint_id.clone(), checkpoint.clone());`
|
||||
cache
|
||||
.add_checkpoint(checkpoint_id.clone(), checkpoint.clone())
|
||||
.unwrap();
|
||||
.expect("error type is Infallible");
|
||||
Ok(())
|
||||
})?;
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -74,26 +76,37 @@ where
|
|||
}
|
||||
self.deferred_actions.clear();
|
||||
|
||||
for shard_root in self.cache.get_shard_roots().unwrap() {
|
||||
for shard_root in self
|
||||
.cache
|
||||
.get_shard_roots()
|
||||
.expect("error type is Infallible")
|
||||
{
|
||||
self.backend.put_shard(
|
||||
self.cache
|
||||
.get_shard(shard_root)
|
||||
.unwrap()
|
||||
.expect("error type is Infallible")
|
||||
.expect("known address"),
|
||||
)?;
|
||||
}
|
||||
self.backend.put_cap(self.cache.get_cap().unwrap())?;
|
||||
self.backend
|
||||
.put_cap(self.cache.get_cap().expect("error type is Infallible"))?;
|
||||
|
||||
let mut checkpoints = Vec::with_capacity(self.cache.checkpoint_count().unwrap());
|
||||
let mut checkpoints = Vec::with_capacity(
|
||||
self.cache
|
||||
.checkpoint_count()
|
||||
.expect("error type is Infallible"),
|
||||
);
|
||||
self.cache
|
||||
.with_checkpoints(
|
||||
self.cache.checkpoint_count().unwrap(),
|
||||
self.cache
|
||||
.checkpoint_count()
|
||||
.expect("error type is Infallible"),
|
||||
|checkpoint_id, checkpoint| {
|
||||
checkpoints.push((checkpoint_id.clone(), checkpoint.clone()));
|
||||
Ok(())
|
||||
},
|
||||
)
|
||||
.unwrap();
|
||||
.expect("error type is Infallible");
|
||||
for (checkpoint_id, checkpoint) in checkpoints {
|
||||
self.backend.add_checkpoint(checkpoint_id, checkpoint)?;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -218,10 +218,13 @@ impl<A, V> LocatedTree<A, V> {
|
|||
|
||||
/// Returns the value at the specified position, if any.
|
||||
pub fn value_at_position(&self, position: Position) -> Option<&V> {
|
||||
/// Pre-condition: `addr` must be the address of `root`.
|
||||
fn go<A, V>(pos: Position, addr: Address, root: &Tree<A, V>) -> Option<&V> {
|
||||
match &root.0 {
|
||||
Node::Parent { left, right, .. } => {
|
||||
let (l_addr, r_addr) = addr.children().unwrap();
|
||||
let (l_addr, r_addr) = addr
|
||||
.children()
|
||||
.expect("has children because we checked `root` is a parent");
|
||||
if l_addr.position_range().contains(&pos) {
|
||||
go(pos, l_addr, left)
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
|
@ -265,6 +268,7 @@ impl<A: Default + Clone, V: Clone> LocatedTree<A, V> {
|
|||
/// if the tree is terminated by a [`Node::Nil`] or leaf node before the specified address can
|
||||
/// be reached.
|
||||
pub fn subtree(&self, addr: Address) -> Option<Self> {
|
||||
/// Pre-condition: `root_addr` must be the address of `root`.
|
||||
fn go<A: Clone, V: Clone>(
|
||||
root_addr: Address,
|
||||
root: &Tree<A, V>,
|
||||
|
@ -278,7 +282,9 @@ impl<A: Default + Clone, V: Clone> LocatedTree<A, V> {
|
|||
} else {
|
||||
match &root.0 {
|
||||
Node::Parent { left, right, .. } => {
|
||||
let (l_addr, r_addr) = root_addr.children().unwrap();
|
||||
let (l_addr, r_addr) = root_addr
|
||||
.children()
|
||||
.expect("has children because we checked `root` is a parent");
|
||||
if l_addr.contains(&addr) {
|
||||
go(l_addr, left.as_ref(), addr)
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
|
@ -302,6 +308,7 @@ impl<A: Default + Clone, V: Clone> LocatedTree<A, V> {
|
|||
/// If this root address of this tree is lower down in the tree than the level specified,
|
||||
/// the entire tree is returned as the sole element of the result vector.
|
||||
pub fn decompose_to_level(self, level: Level) -> Vec<Self> {
|
||||
/// Pre-condition: `root_addr` must be the address of `root`.
|
||||
fn go<A: Clone, V: Clone>(
|
||||
level: Level,
|
||||
root_addr: Address,
|
||||
|
@ -312,7 +319,9 @@ impl<A: Default + Clone, V: Clone> LocatedTree<A, V> {
|
|||
} else {
|
||||
match root.0 {
|
||||
Node::Parent { left, right, .. } => {
|
||||
let (l_addr, r_addr) = root_addr.children().unwrap();
|
||||
let (l_addr, r_addr) = root_addr
|
||||
.children()
|
||||
.expect("has children because we checked `root` is a parent");
|
||||
let mut l_decomposed = go(
|
||||
level,
|
||||
l_addr,
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue