From 067befbb0852e1e2c7b4dc765b1180c25a58390f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daira Hopwood Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2021 14:21:18 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] ZIP 316: The P2PKH extended public key format can be used in place of a P2PKH-only UFVK/UIVK. Signed-off-by: Daira Hopwood --- zip-0316.rst | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/zip-0316.rst b/zip-0316.rst index a836ffa9..58686f0f 100644 --- a/zip-0316.rst +++ b/zip-0316.rst @@ -426,8 +426,9 @@ Requirements for both Unified Addresses and Unified Viewing Keys * A Unified Address or Unified Viewing Key MUST NOT contain only transparent P2SH or P2PKH addresses (Typecodes :math:`\mathtt{0x00}` and :math:`\mathtt{0x01}`). The rationale is that the existing - P2SH and P2PKH transparent-only address formats suffice for this - purpose and are already supported by the existing ecosystem. + P2SH and P2PKH transparent-only address formats, and the existing + P2PKH extended public key format, suffice for this purpose and are + already supported by the existing ecosystem. * The :math:`\mathtt{typecode}` and :math:`\mathtt{length}` fields are encoded as :math:`\mathtt{compactSize}.` [#Bitcoin-CompactSize]_