Remove the claim that Discrete Logarithm Independence is stronger than collision resistance of GroupHash.

(That's not clearly true, and it's irrelevant.)

Signed-off-by: Daira Hopwood <daira@jacaranda.org>
This commit is contained in:
Daira Hopwood 2020-05-27 17:20:27 +01:00
parent 8d19a94716
commit 092e6092ef
1 changed files with 1 additions and 2 deletions

View File

@ -3862,8 +3862,7 @@ not return $\bot$) as a random oracle.
\item Under the Discrete Logarithm assumption on $\SubgroupG{}$, a random oracle almost surely satisfies
Discrete Logarithm Independence. Discrete Logarithm Independence implies \collisionResistance\!,
since a collision $(m_1, m_2)$ for $\GroupGHash{\URS}$ trivially gives a
discrete logarithm relation with $x_1 = 1$ and $x_2 = -1$. It is in fact
stronger than \collisionResistance\!.
discrete logarithm relation with $x_1 = 1$ and $x_2 = -1$.
\item $\GroupJHash{}$ is also used to instantiate $\DiversifyHash$ in \crossref{concretediversifyhash}.
We do not know how to prove the Unlinkability property defined in that section
in the standard model, but in a model where $\GroupJHash{}$ (restricted to