mirror of https://github.com/zcash/zips.git
Update to reflect the ECC/ZF trademark agreement
This commit is contained in:
parent
5db9d91870
commit
2d38080008
30
zip-XXXX.rst
30
zip-XXXX.rst
|
@ -135,32 +135,28 @@ privacy proponents who have driven this ecosystem forward and represent its
|
||||||
values. Nevertheless, their mode of operation today skews a healthy balance of
|
values. Nevertheless, their mode of operation today skews a healthy balance of
|
||||||
power in Zcash governance.
|
power in Zcash governance.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The mechanisms of that skew are the Zcash trademark, held by the ECC, and
|
The mechanisms of that skew are the Zcash trademark, held jointly by the
|
||||||
primary client software development, now split between the ECC and the
|
Foundation and the ECC, and primary client software development, now split
|
||||||
Foundation.
|
between the ECC and the Foundation.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
In a disagreement between miners, users, and developers, the ECC has the
|
In a disagreement between miners, users, and developers, the Foundation and ECC
|
||||||
unilateral option of enforcing the Zcash trademark, effectively allowing them
|
have the option of enforcing the Zcash trademark, effectively allowing them to
|
||||||
to choose a winning fork against the will of users, miners, and other
|
choose a winning fork against the will of users, miners, and other developers.
|
||||||
developers.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
While the Foundation's maintenance of the `zebrad` client would normally allow
|
In addition, the Foundation's sole maintenance of the `zebrad` client allows
|
||||||
them to "soft veto" a network upgrade, they don't have a similar veto on the
|
them to "soft veto" a network upgrade.
|
||||||
Zcash trademark enforcement.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Compounding these issues, the Foundation and the ECC aren't arms-length entities
|
Unfortunately, the Foundation and the ECC aren't organized as arms-length
|
||||||
as they're organized today.
|
entities today.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
This situation poses a number of problems for new and existing Zcash users, as
|
This situation poses a number of problems for new and existing Zcash users, as
|
||||||
well as both entities.
|
well as both entities.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
* The threat of a central entity overriding (or being forced to override) the
|
* The threat of two entangled entities overriding (or being forced to override)
|
||||||
will of users undermines self-sovereignty.
|
the will of users undermines self-sovereignty.
|
||||||
* The ECC and Foundation are both put at legal risk. As entangled entities,
|
* The ECC and Foundation are both put at legal risk. As entangled entities,
|
||||||
they're remarkably similar to a single entity when trying to minimize
|
they're remarkably similar to a single entity when trying to minimize
|
||||||
regulatory risk.
|
regulatory risk.
|
||||||
* Power between the two entites *hasn't* been decentralized. The ECC remains
|
|
||||||
a unilateral power, as well as a single point of failure.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The "crowding out" problem
|
The "crowding out" problem
|
||||||
--------------------------
|
--------------------------
|
||||||
|
@ -324,7 +320,7 @@ The principal developer shall make a number of guarantees.
|
||||||
the Foundation as assurance.
|
the Foundation as assurance.
|
||||||
2. They shall maintain a well-run board and employ a qualified CFO.
|
2. They shall maintain a well-run board and employ a qualified CFO.
|
||||||
3. In addition to the existing open-source requirements, they shall agree to
|
3. In addition to the existing open-source requirements, they shall agree to
|
||||||
assign any trademarks or patents relevant to Zcash to the Foundation.
|
assign any patents relevant to Zcash to the Foundation.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
In exchange, the principal developer is granted an indefinite minimum dev fee
|
In exchange, the principal developer is granted an indefinite minimum dev fee
|
||||||
allocation of 20%, with a maximum allocation of 35% of the total fee, as
|
allocation of 20%, with a maximum allocation of 35% of the total fee, as
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue