From 67bbc459cb103802ccf1a5899c89bf63112df3d9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Ad=C3=AD?= Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2020 16:58:08 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] Apply suggestions from code review Co-authored-by: Daira Hopwood --- zip-reduce-shielded_tx_fee.rst | 5 +---- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/zip-reduce-shielded_tx_fee.rst b/zip-reduce-shielded_tx_fee.rst index bccf2441..dd9989e8 100644 --- a/zip-reduce-shielded_tx_fee.rst +++ b/zip-reduce-shielded_tx_fee.rst @@ -17,9 +17,6 @@ The key words "MUST", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "MAY", "RECOMMENDED", "OPTIONAL", and "REQUIRED" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119. [#RFC2119]_ -"Z" refers to shielded address. -"T" refers to transparent address. - The term "conventional transaction fee" in this document is in reference to the value of a transaction fee that is conventionally used by wallets, and that a user can reasonably expect miners on the Zcash network to accept @@ -67,7 +64,7 @@ aspects of the Zcash chain. The harmonization of fees between different kinds of transaction can be expected to improve usability, consistency, and predictability. -Requirements for consensus +Requirements for adoption ------------------------- The change to the conventional transaction fees should be undertaken soon