From 6e3c173538d1ed1e4e3c58dafd4ac4b09d2622ab Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daira Hopwood Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2020 23:53:55 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Update a comment about BIPs (which is not in the rendered document). Signed-off-by: Daira Hopwood --- protocol/protocol.tex | 23 +++++------------------ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) diff --git a/protocol/protocol.tex b/protocol/protocol.tex index 442e637a..68a5a8e8 100644 --- a/protocol/protocol.tex +++ b/protocol/protocol.tex @@ -10239,25 +10239,12 @@ in \crossref{transparentaddrencoding}. have supported Bloom-filtered connections since launch). \end{itemize} -\begin{comment} -\cite{BIP-22} and \cite{BIP-23} apply with some protocol changes, which are -to be specified in a Zcash Improvement Proposal. +%\cite{BIP-22} and \cite{BIP-23} apply with some protocol changes, which are +%to be specified in a Zcash Improvement Proposal. -The following BIPs can be used unchanged, but do not define consensus rules: -\cite{BIP-69}, -\cite{BIP-126}. - -The following BIPs can be used by replacing the URI scheme \ascii{bitcoin:} -with \ascii{zcash:}, and the MIME types starting with \ascii{bitcoin-} with -corresponding types starting with \ascii{zcash-}: -\cite{BIP-21}, -\cite{BIP-70}, -\cite{BIP-71}, -\cite{BIP-72}, -\cite{BIP-73}. -(Note that this URI scheme and these MIME types are not formally allocated, -and would require an RFC in order to do so.) -\end{comment} +%The following BIPs can be used unchanged, but do not define consensus rules: +%\cite{BIP-69}, +%\cite{BIP-126}. \introsection