ZIP 1014: remove redundant credit line and fix potentially bad incentive structure in volatility reserve.

Originally 71de73058e

Co-Authored-By: Josh Cincinnati <acityinohio@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Daira Hopwood <daira@jacaranda.org>
This commit is contained in:
Daira Hopwood 2020-01-07 15:59:39 +00:00
parent 642f7c6f1a
commit a23752742b
1 changed files with 1 additions and 4 deletions

View File

@ -5,7 +5,6 @@
Owner: Josh Cincinnati <josh@zfnd.org> Owner: Josh Cincinnati <josh@zfnd.org>
Original-Author: Eran Tromer Original-Author: Eran Tromer
Credits: Matt Luongo Credits: Matt Luongo
Josh Cincinnati
Howard Loo Howard Loo
@aristarchus @aristarchus
@dontbeevil @dontbeevil
@ -202,9 +201,7 @@ following additional constraints:
3. Major Grants may be issued to ECC only if there are no other proposals 3. Major Grants may be issued to ECC only if there are no other proposals
to perform the specified work with similar capabilities, effectiveness and to perform the specified work with similar capabilities, effectiveness and
cost. The ECC will not be eligible for Major Grants if they have any funds cost. (The intent is that eventually ECC will not receive Major Grants.)
available in their slice's Volatility Reserve. (The intent is that
eventually ECC will not receive Major Grants.)
4. Priority should be given to Major Grants that bolster teams with 4. Priority should be given to Major Grants that bolster teams with
substantial (current or prospective) continual existence, and set them up substantial (current or prospective) continual existence, and set them up