mirror of https://github.com/zcash/zips.git
removes development mailing list and changes to community forums
This commit is contained in:
parent
8af142b670
commit
bb306ec6b3
40
zip-0000.rst
40
zip-0000.rst
|
@ -60,8 +60,8 @@ brought forward for changing Zcash that have been rejected for various
|
|||
reasons. The first step should be to search past discussions to see if
|
||||
an idea has been considered before, and if so, what issues arose in its
|
||||
progression. After investigating past work, the best way to proceed is
|
||||
by posting about the new idea to the `Zcash Ecosystem Development
|
||||
list <https://lists.z.cash.foundation/mailman/listinfo/zcash-ecosystem-dev>`__.
|
||||
by posting about the new idea to the `Zcash Community Forum
|
||||
<https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/>`__.
|
||||
|
||||
Vetting an idea publicly before going as far as writing a ZIP is meant
|
||||
to save both the potential Owner and the wider community time. Asking
|
||||
|
@ -75,8 +75,7 @@ where Zcash is used.
|
|||
|
||||
Once the Owner has asked the Zcash community as to whether an idea
|
||||
has any chance of acceptance, a draft ZIP should be presented to the
|
||||
`Zcash Ecosystem Development list
|
||||
<https://lists.z.cash.foundation/mailman/listinfo/zcash-ecosystem-dev>`__.
|
||||
`Zcash Community Forum <https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/>`__.
|
||||
This gives the Owner a chance to flesh out the draft ZIP to make it
|
||||
properly formatted, of high quality, and to address additional concerns
|
||||
about the proposal. Following a discussion, the proposal should be
|
||||
|
@ -88,8 +87,7 @@ it a ZIP number (Owners MUST NOT self-assign ZIP numbers).
|
|||
|
||||
ZIP Owners are responsible for collecting community feedback on both
|
||||
the initial idea and the ZIP before submitting it for review. However,
|
||||
wherever possible, long open-ended discussions on public mailing lists
|
||||
should be avoided.
|
||||
wherever possible, long open-ended discussions on forums should be avoided.
|
||||
|
||||
It is highly recommended that a single ZIP contain a single key proposal
|
||||
or new idea. The more focused the ZIP, the more successful it tends to
|
||||
|
@ -147,7 +145,7 @@ be selected by consensus among the current Editors.
|
|||
ZIP Editor Responsibilities & Workflow
|
||||
--------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
The ZIP Editors subscribe to the Zcash Ecosystem Development list.
|
||||
The ZIP Editors subscribe to the Zcash Community Forum.
|
||||
|
||||
For each new ZIP that comes in an Editor confirms the following:
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -155,8 +153,8 @@ For each new ZIP that comes in an Editor confirms the following:
|
|||
must make technical sense, even if they don't seem likely to be
|
||||
accepted.
|
||||
* The title should accurately describe the content.
|
||||
* The ZIP draft must have been sent to the Zcash Ecosystem Development
|
||||
mailing list or another suitable forum for discussion.
|
||||
* The ZIP draft must have been sent to the Zcash Community Forum or as
|
||||
a PR to the `ZIPs git repository <https://github.com/zcash/zips>`__
|
||||
* Motivation and backward compatibility (when applicable) must be
|
||||
addressed.
|
||||
* The licensing terms are acceptable for ZIPs.
|
||||
|
@ -313,10 +311,9 @@ Owners of the ZIP. The format of the Owners header value SHOULD be::
|
|||
If there are multiple Owners, each should be on a separate line.
|
||||
|
||||
While a ZIP is in private discussions (usually during the initial Draft
|
||||
phase), a Discussions-To header will indicate the mailing list or URL
|
||||
where the ZIP is being discussed. No Discussions-To header is necessary
|
||||
if the ZIP is being discussed privately with the Owner, or on the
|
||||
Zcash email mailing lists.
|
||||
phase), a Discussions-To header will indicate the URL where the ZIP is
|
||||
being discussed. No Discussions-To header is necessary if the ZIP is being
|
||||
discussed privately with the Owner.
|
||||
|
||||
The Category header specifies the type of ZIP: Consensus, Standards Track,
|
||||
Informational, or Process.
|
||||
|
@ -378,12 +375,11 @@ ZIP Status Field
|
|||
consideration by the community, they may set the status to Withdrawn.
|
||||
|
||||
* Active: Typically only used for Process/Informational ZIPs, achieved
|
||||
once rough consensus is reached in PR/mailing list from Draft Process
|
||||
ZIP.
|
||||
once rough consensus is reached in PR/forum posts from Draft Process ZIP.
|
||||
|
||||
* Proposed: Typically the stage after Draft, added to a ZIP after
|
||||
consideration, feedback, and rough consensus from the community. The ZIP Editors must
|
||||
validate this change before it is approved.
|
||||
consideration, feedback, and rough consensus from the community. The ZIP
|
||||
Editors must validate this change before it is approved.
|
||||
|
||||
* Rejected: The status when progress hasn't been made on the ZIP in one
|
||||
year. Can revert back to Draft/Proposed if the Owner resumes work
|
||||
|
@ -408,13 +404,13 @@ Draft or Withdrawn.
|
|||
|
||||
A ZIP may only change status from Draft (or Rejected) to Proposed, when
|
||||
the Owner deems it is complete and there is rough consensus on the
|
||||
mailing list, validated by both the Electric Coin Company and Zcash Foundation
|
||||
forums, validated by both the Electric Coin Company and Zcash Foundation
|
||||
Editors. One Editor will not suffice -- there needs to be consensus
|
||||
among the Editors. If it's a Standards Track ZIP, upon changing status to
|
||||
Proposed the Editors will add the optional ``Network Upgrade`` header
|
||||
to the preamble, indicating the intent for the ZIP to be implemented in
|
||||
the specified network upgrade. (All ``Network Upgrade`` schedules will be
|
||||
distributed via the Zcash Ecosystem Developer list by the Editors.)
|
||||
distributed via the Zcash Community Forum by the Editors.)
|
||||
|
||||
A Standards Track ZIP may only change status from Proposed to
|
||||
Implemented once the Owner provides an associated reference
|
||||
|
@ -435,9 +431,9 @@ A Consensus or Standards Track ZIP becomes Final when its associated
|
|||
network upgrade or other protocol change is activated on Zcash's mainnet.
|
||||
|
||||
A Process or Informational ZIP may change status from Draft to Active
|
||||
when it achieves rough consensus on the mailing list. Such a proposal is
|
||||
when it achieves rough consensus on the forum or PR. Such a proposal is
|
||||
said to have rough consensus if it has been open to discussion on the
|
||||
development mailing list for at least one month, and no person maintains
|
||||
forum or GitHub PR for at least one month, and no person maintains
|
||||
any unaddressed substantiated objections to it. Addressed or obstructive
|
||||
objections may be ignored/overruled by general agreement that they have
|
||||
been sufficiently addressed, but clear reasoning must be given in such
|
||||
|
@ -454,7 +450,7 @@ ZIP Comments
|
|||
============
|
||||
|
||||
Comments from the community on the ZIP should occur on the Zcash
|
||||
Ecosystem Developer list and the comment fields of the pull requests in
|
||||
Community Forum and the comment fields of the pull requests in
|
||||
any open ZIPs. Editors will use these sources to judge rough consensus.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue