Clarify dev fee changes via network upgrade

This structure makes it clear that the Foundation isn't "paying" the dev
fee recipients -- a logistics mess -- and instead recommends changes per
network upgrade.
This commit is contained in:
Matt Luongo 2019-10-19 21:52:39 -04:00 committed by Daira Hopwood
parent c458556923
commit bf5cfa4806
1 changed files with 8 additions and 3 deletions

View File

@ -252,9 +252,14 @@ working to maintain clients.
the Foundation's at $500k per month based on a volume-weighted average price. the Foundation's at $500k per month based on a volume-weighted average price.
* The remaining two thirds of the fee (50% of the total), called the "outside * The remaining two thirds of the fee (50% of the total), called the "outside
development fee", shall be distributed between at least two development teams, development fee", shall be distributed between at least two development teams,
chosen semi-annually by the Foundation. Unlike those of the Foundation and chosen semi-annually by the Foundation, coinciding with network upgrades.
principal developer, these allocations aren't limited by market conditions, Unlike those of the Foundation and principal developer, these allocations
and don't carry a burn requirement. aren't limited by market conditions, and don't carry a burn requirement.
Prior to each network upgrade, the Foundation shall recommend a list of
addresses and a total number of ZEC per block each address is meant to receive
from the dev fee. The recommendation will be "ratified" by the miners as the
network upgrade activates.
The role of dev fee recipients The role of dev fee recipients
------------------------------ ------------------------------