Correct the order of arguments to COMM in its instantiation.

Signed-off-by: Daira Hopwood <daira@jacaranda.org>
This commit is contained in:
Daira Hopwood 2017-03-07 20:52:53 +00:00
parent 91895ee7a7
commit d4bfecea9b
1 changed files with 2 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@ -2547,7 +2547,7 @@ The commitment scheme $\Commit{}$ specified in \crossref{abstractcomm} is
instantiated using $\FullHashName$ as follows:
\begin{formulae}[leftmargin=1em]
\item $\Commit{\NoteCommitRand}(\Value, \AuthPublic, \NoteAddressRand) := \FullHashbox{\cmbox}$.
\item $\Commit{\NoteCommitRand}(\AuthPublic, \Value, \NoteAddressRand) := \FullHashbox{\cmbox}$.
\end{formulae}
\pnote{
@ -4134,6 +4134,7 @@ The errors in the proof of Ledger Indistinguishability mentioned in
\begin{itemize}
\item Clarify the consensus rule preventing double-spends.
\item Clarify what a \noteCommitment opens to in \crossref{crprf}.
\item Correct the order of arguments to $\Commit{}$ in \crossref{concretecomm}.
\end{itemize}
\introlist