mirror of https://github.com/zcash/zips.git
Correct the order of arguments to COMM in its instantiation.
Signed-off-by: Daira Hopwood <daira@jacaranda.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
91895ee7a7
commit
d4bfecea9b
|
@ -2547,7 +2547,7 @@ The commitment scheme $\Commit{}$ specified in \crossref{abstractcomm} is
|
||||||
instantiated using $\FullHashName$ as follows:
|
instantiated using $\FullHashName$ as follows:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\begin{formulae}[leftmargin=1em]
|
\begin{formulae}[leftmargin=1em]
|
||||||
\item $\Commit{\NoteCommitRand}(\Value, \AuthPublic, \NoteAddressRand) := \FullHashbox{\cmbox}$.
|
\item $\Commit{\NoteCommitRand}(\AuthPublic, \Value, \NoteAddressRand) := \FullHashbox{\cmbox}$.
|
||||||
\end{formulae}
|
\end{formulae}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\pnote{
|
\pnote{
|
||||||
|
@ -4134,6 +4134,7 @@ The errors in the proof of Ledger Indistinguishability mentioned in
|
||||||
\begin{itemize}
|
\begin{itemize}
|
||||||
\item Clarify the consensus rule preventing double-spends.
|
\item Clarify the consensus rule preventing double-spends.
|
||||||
\item Clarify what a \noteCommitment opens to in \crossref{crprf}.
|
\item Clarify what a \noteCommitment opens to in \crossref{crprf}.
|
||||||
|
\item Correct the order of arguments to $\Commit{}$ in \crossref{concretecomm}.
|
||||||
\end{itemize}
|
\end{itemize}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\introlist
|
\introlist
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue