mirror of https://github.com/zcash/zips.git
Make slight adjustments
This commit is contained in:
parent
d4e37652ad
commit
d6181913b8
|
@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|||
::
|
||||
|
||||
ZIP: ???
|
||||
ZIP: 210
|
||||
Title: Prohibit Negative Shielded Value Pool
|
||||
Author: Sean Bowe <sean@z.cash>
|
||||
Category: Consensus
|
||||
|
@ -13,9 +13,9 @@ Terminology
|
|||
The key words "MUST", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", and "MAY" in this document are to be interpreted as described in
|
||||
RFC 2119. [#RFC2119]_
|
||||
|
||||
The "Sprout value pool", as described by section 4.11 of the Zcash Protocol Specification [#protocol]_, is the sum of all previous transactions' ``vpub_old`` fields subtracted by the sum of all previous transactions ``vpub_new`` fields.
|
||||
The "Sprout value pool balance", as implied by section 4.11 of the Zcash Protocol Specification [#protocol]_, is the sum of all previous transactions' ``vpub_old`` fields subtracted by the sum of all previous transactions ``vpub_new`` fields.
|
||||
|
||||
The "Sapling value pool", as described by section 4.12 of Zcash Protocol Specification [#protocol]_, is the negation of the sum of all previous transactions' ``valueBalance`` fields.
|
||||
The "Sapling value pool balance", as implied by section 4.12 of Zcash Protocol Specification [#protocol]_, is the negation of the sum of all previous transactions' ``valueBalance`` fields.
|
||||
|
||||
Abstract
|
||||
========
|
||||
|
@ -32,7 +32,9 @@ It would be preferable for the network to reject blocks that result in the afore
|
|||
Specification
|
||||
=============
|
||||
|
||||
If the "Sprout value pool" or "Sapling value pool" were to become negative as a result of accepting a block, then all nodes MUST reject the block as invalid.
|
||||
If the "Sprout value pool balance" or "Sapling value pool balance" were to become negative as a result of accepting a block, then all nodes MUST reject the block as invalid.
|
||||
|
||||
Nodes MAY relay transactions even if one or more of them cannot be mined due to the aforementioned restriction.
|
||||
|
||||
Deployment
|
||||
==========
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue