mirror of https://github.com/zcash/zips.git
Update draft-noamchom67-manufacturing-consent.rst
updated details about exception scenario for the activation of a "non-direct funding model" in less than 4 years, based on Conrado's review questions. Also noted the TBD nature of ZF and FPF participation as direct block subsidy administrators.
This commit is contained in:
parent
97a510e1b0
commit
db59b5dc16
|
@ -102,9 +102,19 @@ the ecosystem to design and deploy a "non-direct funding model" as generally
|
|||
recommended in Josh Swihart's proposal.
|
||||
<https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/zcash-funding-bloc-a-dev-fund-proposal-from-josh-at-ecc/47187>
|
||||
|
||||
Upon creation/ activation of a "non-direct funding model" this ZIP should be
|
||||
reconsider by the Zcash ecosystem, to determine if it's ongoing direct block subsidies are
|
||||
a preference. Discussions/ solications/ sentiment gathering from the Zcash
|
||||
ecosystem should be initiated ~6 months in advance of the presumed
|
||||
activation of a "non-direct funding model", such that the Zcash ecosystem
|
||||
preference can be expediently realized.
|
||||
|
||||
Block subsidies will be administered through two organizations:
|
||||
1. Zcash Foundation (for ECC, ZCG)
|
||||
2. Financial Privacy Fund (for Qedit, ZecHub)
|
||||
1. Zcash Foundation (**for ECC, ZCG)
|
||||
2. Financial Privacy Fund (**for Qedit, ZecHub)
|
||||
|
||||
**ZF and FPF adminstration details, costs, et al are currently under debate**
|
||||
<https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/proposal-zcg-under-fpf/48113/11>
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Motivation
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue