7.7 KiB
FROST messages
Proposes a message layout to exchange information between participants of a FROST setup using the jubjub curve.
Motivation
Currently FROST library is complete for 2 round signatures with a dealer/aggregator setup. This proposal is only considering that specific features, additions and upgrades will need to be made when DKG is implemented.
Assuming all participants have a FROST library available we need to define message structures in a way that data can be exchanged between participants. The proposal is a collection of data types so each side can do all the actions needed for a real life situation.
Definitions
dealer
aggergator
signer
nonce
commitment
Guide-level explanation
We propose a message separated in 2 parts, a header and a payload:
struct Message {
header: Header,
payload: Payload,
}
Header
will look as follows:
struct Header {
msg_type: MsgType,
version: MsgVersion,
sender: Participant,
receiver: Participant,
}
While Payload
will be defined as:
enum Payload {
DealerBroadcast(MsgDealerBroadcast),
Commitments(MsgCommitments),
SigningPackage(MsgSigningPackage),
SignatureShare(MsgSignatureShare),
FinalSignature(MsgFinalSignature),
}
All the messages and new types will be defined in a new file src/frost/messages.rs
Reference-level explanation
Here we explore in detail the header types and all the message payloads.
Header
Fields of the header define new types. Proposed implementation for them is as follows:
#[repr(u8)]
#[non_exhaustive]
enum MsgType {
DealerBroadcast,
Commitments,
SigningPackage,
SignatureShare,
FinalSignature,
}
struct MsgVersion(u8);
struct Participant(u8);
Payloads
Each payload defines a new message:
// Dealer must send this message with initial data to each participant involved.
// With this, the participant should be able to build a `SharePackage` and use
// the `sign()` function.
// `public_key` can be calculated from the `secret_key`.
// from `secret_key`.
struct MsgDealerBroadcast {
// The secret key as a frost::Scalar.
secret_key: frost::Scalar,
// Commitments for the signer as jubjub::AffinePoint.
commitment: jubjub::AffinePoint,
// The point and verification bytes needed to generate the group public key
group_public: (jubjub::AffinePoint, [u8; 32]),
}
// Each signer participant send to the aggregator the 2 points
// needed for commitment building.
struct MsgCommitments {
// The hiding Point.
hiding: jubjub::AffinePoint,
// The binding Point.
binding: jubjub::AffinePoint,
}
// The aggergator decide what message is going to be signed and
// send it to each participant with all the commitments collected.
struct MsgSigningPackage {
// The message to be signed as bytes
message: &'static [u8],
// The collected unpacked commitments for each signer
commitments: Vec<(u8, jubjub::AffinePoint, jubjub::AffinePoint),
}
// Each signer send the signatures to the agregator who is going to collect them
// and generate a final spend signature.
struct MsgSignatureShare {
// The signature to be shared as a Scalar
signature: frost::Scalar,
}
// The final signature is broadcasted by the aggegator
// to any participant.
struct MsgFinalSignature {
// The r_bytes and s_bytes needed to build the frost::Signature
final_signature: ([u8; 32], [u8; 32]),
}
Validation
Validation is implemented to each new data type as needed. This will ensure the creation of valid messages before they are send and right after they are received. We create a trait for this as follows:
pub trait Validate {
fn validate(&self) -> Result<&Self, MsgErr>;
}
And we implement where needed. For example, in the header, sender and receiver can't be the same:
impl Validate for Header {
fn validate(&self) -> Result<&Self, MsgErr> {
if self.sender.0 == self.receiver.0 {
return Err(MsgErr::SameSenderAndReceiver);
}
Ok(self)
}
}
This will require to have validation error messages as:
use thiserror::Error;
#[derive(Clone, Error, Debug)]
pub enum MsgErr {
#[error("sender and receiver are the same")]
SameSenderAndReceiver,
}
Then to create a valid Header
in the sender side we call:
let header = Validate::validate(&Header {
..
}).expect("a valid header");
The receiver side will validate the header using the same method. Instead of panicking the error can be ignored to don't crash and keep waiting for other (potentially valid) messages.
if let Ok(header) = msg.header.validate() {
..
}
Serialization/Deserialization
Each message struct needs to serialize to bytes representation before it is sent through the wire and must deserialize to the same struct (round trip) on the receiver side. We use serde
and macro derivations (Serialize
and Deserialize
) to automatically implement where possible.
This will require deriving serde in several types defined in frost.rs
.
Manual implementation of serialization/deserialization will be located at a new mod src/frost/serialize.rs
.
Header
The Header
part of the message is 4 bytes total:
Bytes | Field name | Data type |
---|---|---|
1 | msg_type | u8 |
1 | version | u8 |
1 | sender | u8 |
1 | receiver | u8 |
Primitive types
Payload
s use data types that we need to specify first. We have 2 primitive types inside the payload messages:
Scalar
Scalar
is a an alias for jubjub::Fr
and this is a [u64; 4]
as documented in https://github.com/zkcrypto/jubjub/blob/main/src/fr.rs#L16
AffinePoint
Much of the math in FROST is done using jubjub::ExtendedPoint
. This is a structure with 5 jubjub::Fq
s as defined in https://github.com/zkcrypto/jubjub/blob/main/src/lib.rs#L128-L134
Each Fq
needed to form a jubjub::ExtendedPoint
are Scalar
s of bls12_381
crate. Scalar here is [u64; 4]
as documented in https://github.com/zkcrypto/bls12_381/blob/main/src/scalar.rs#L16
For message exchange jubjub::AffinePoint
s are a better choice as they are shorter in bytes, they are formed of 2 jubjub::Fq
instead of 5: https://github.com/zkcrypto/jubjub/blob/main/src/lib.rs#L70-L73
Conversion from one type to the other is trivial:
https://docs.rs/jubjub/0.6.0/jubjub/struct.AffinePoint.html#impl-From%3CExtendedPoint%3E https://docs.rs/jubjub/0.6.0/jubjub/struct.ExtendedPoint.html#impl-From%3CAffinePoint%3E
Payload
Payload part of the message is variable in size and depends on message type.
MsgDealerBroadcast
Bytes | Field name | Data type |
---|---|---|
256 | secret_key | Scalar |
512 | commitments | AffinePoint |
256+32 | group_public | (AffinePoint, [u8; 32]) |
MsgCommitments
Bytes | Field name | Data type |
---|---|---|
512 | hiding | AffinePoint |
512 | binding | AffinePoint |
MsgSigningPackage
Bytes | Field name | Data type |
---|---|---|
? | message | [u8] |
1+256+256 | commitments | (u8, AffinePoint, AffinePoint) |
SignatureShare
Bytes | Field name | Data type |
---|---|---|
256 | signature | Scalar |
MsgFinalSignature
Bytes | Field name | Data type |
---|---|---|
64 | signature | ([u8; 32], [u8; 32]) |
Testing plan
- Create a happy path unit test similar to https://github.com/ZcashFoundation/redjubjub/blob/frost-messages/tests/frost.rs#L7 and:
- Make messages on each step.
- Simulate send/receive.
- Test round trip serialization/deserialization on each message.
- Create property tests for each message.