* add hint for port error
* add issue filter for port panic
* add lock file hint
* add metrics endpoint port conflict hint
* add hint for tracing endpoint port conflict
* add acceptance test for resource conflics
* Split out common conflict test code into a function
* Add state, metrics, and tracing conflict tests
* Add a full set of stderr acceptance test functions
This change makes the stdout and stderr acceptance test interfaces
identical.
* move Zcash listener opening
* add todo about hint for disk full
* add constant for lock file
* match path in state cache
* don't match windows cache path
* Use Display for state path logs
Avoids weird escaping on Windows when using Debug
* Add Windows conflict error messages
* Turn PORT_IN_USE_ERROR into a regex
And add another alternative Windows-specific port error
Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>
Co-authored-by: Jane Lusby <jane@zfnd.org>
* Bump versions where appropriate
Tested with cargo install --locked --path etc
* Remove fixed panics from 'Known Issues'
* Change to alpha release series in the README
Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>
## Motivation
This PR is motivated by the regression identified in https://github.com/ZcashFoundation/zebra/issues/1349. That PR notes that the metrics stopped working for most of the crates other than `zebrad`.
## Solution
This PR resolves the regression by deduplicating the `metrics` crate dependency. During a recent change we upgraded the metrics version in `zebrad` and a couple other of our crates, but we never updated the dependencies in `zebra-state`, `zebra-consensus`, or `zebra-network`. This caused the metrics macros to attempt to retrieve the current metrics exporter through the wrong function. We would install the metrics exporter in `0.13`, but then attempt to look it up through the `0.12` crate, which contains a different instance of the metrics exporter static variable which is unset. Doing this causes the metrics macros to return `None` for the current exporter after which they just silently give up.
## Related Issues
closes https://github.com/ZcashFoundation/zebra/issues/1349
## Follow Up Work
I noticed we have quite a few duplicate dependencies in our tree. We might be able to save some compilation time by auditing those and deduplicating them as much as possible.
- https://github.com/ZcashFoundation/zebra/issues/1582
Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>
Previously we set the crate versions to 3.x, so that the major version was
aligned with the NU version. But we want to be able to make API changes
independently of the NU schedule.
This change is mostly mechanical, with the exception of the changes to the
`tower-batch` middleware. This middleware was adapted from `tower::buffer`,
and the `tower::buffer` code was changed to implement its own bounded queue,
because Tokio 0.3 removed the `mpsc::Sender::poll_send` method. See
ddc64e8d4d
for more context on the Tower changes. To match Tower as closely as possible
in order to be able to upstream `tower-batch`, those changes are copied from
`tower::Buffer` to `tower-batch`.
This addresses at least three pain points:
- we were affected by bugs that were already fixed in git, but not in
the released crate;
- we can use service combinators to transform requests and responses;
- we can use the hedge middleware.
The version in git is still marked as 0.3.1 but these changes will be
part of tower 0.4: https://github.com/tower-rs/tower/issues/431
We had a brief discussion on discord and it seemed like we had consensus on the
following versioning policy:
* zebrad: match major version to NU version, so we will start by releasing
zebrad 3.0.0;
* zebra-* libraries: start by matching zebrad's version, then increment major
versions of each library as we need to make breaking changes (potentially
faster than the zebrad version, always respecting semver but making no
guarantees about the longevity of major releases).
This commit sets all of the crate versions to 3.0.0-alpha.0 -- the -alpha.0
marks it as a prerelease not subject to perfect adherence to compatibility
guarantees.
Failure uses a distinct Fail trait rather than the standard library's
Error trait, which causes a lot of interoperability problems with tower
and other Error-using crates. Since failure was created, the standard
library's Error trait was improved, and its conveniences are now
available without the custom Fail trait using `thiserror` (for easy
error derives) and `anyhow` (for a better boxed Error).
* Don't expose submodules of zebra_network::peer.
* PeerSet, PeerDiscover stubs.
Co-authored-by: Deirdre Connolly <deirdre@zfnd.org>
* Initial work on PeerSet.
This is adapted from the MIT-licensed tower-balance implementation.
* Use PeerSet in the connect stub.
* Fix authorship, license information.
I *thought* I had done a sed pass over the Cargo defaults when doing
repository initialization, but I guess I missed it or something.
Anyways, fixed now.
Add a tower-based peer implementation.
Tower provides middleware for request-response oriented protocols, while Bitcoin/Zcash just send messages which could be interpreted either as requests or responses, depending on context. To bridge this mismatch we define our own internal request/response protocol, and implement a per-peer event loop that scans incoming messages and interprets them either as requests from the remote peer to our node, or as responses to requests we made previously. This is performed by the `PeerService` task, and a corresponding `PeerClient: tower::Service` can send it requests. These tasks are themselves created by a `PeerConnector: tower::Service` which dials a remote peer and performs a handshake.
This provides a significantly cleaner API to consumers, because it
allows using adaptors that convert a TCP stream to a stream of messages,
and potentially allows more efficient message handling.
Because we want to be able to read messages from async sources (like a
tcp socket), we need to have at least async header parsing logic, so
that we can correctly determine how many bytes to await to parse each
message, so it makes sense for the entire message parsing functions
to be async.
Because we perform message serialization into async readers and writers
in the context of sending messages over the network, code using these
functions is more clear with these names.
Alfredo Garcia
Deirdre Connolly
teor
Jane Lusby
dependabot[bot]
Henry de Valence
Jane Lusby
dependabot-preview[bot]